On Oct 2, 3:17*pm, Jim Higgins <gordian...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 80_Knight wrote:
> > "Jim Higgins" <gordian...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:t9ednbzY0OldjXjVnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@posted.eagl ecomputertechnology...
> >> Hazardous Conditions for the Auto Industry
> >>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/02/bu...=1&oref=slogin
> >> G.M. bucked the trend somewhat with only a 15.6 percent drop in sales.
> >> *But it was helped by employee pricing deals offered to all consumers
> >> and an increase in sales to rental car fleets.* [emphasis added]
>
> > Here you go again, adding your own little thoughts to the article. *There
> > was no "emphasis added" in the original post. *What does it matter how the
> > sales were done, as long as they were done? *Do you think Toyota weren't
> > offering deals to help sell vehicles?
> > You are a true domestic hating Troll.
>
> Please retake your reading comprehension class. *The notation was added
> to show that emphasis was added, by me, so that there would be no doubt
> that this was added (as in added, not in the original article). *Do work
> hard to comprehend very basic things. *That will be difficult for you
> but do make the effort.
>
> --
> Civis Romanus Sum- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


Gotta hand to to there, Jimbo.

Usually, you just let the negative articles you post about GM speak
for itself, thus, you have to do little thinking in the process.


Guess you finaly "thought" a little on your own (sure would like to
know what you used) and figured some people might take something
positive in regards to GM out of this article, so you added your own
notations for emphasis.

There was "no doubt" that this was added by you to "knock" GM a little
more than the article intended to do.


You're slipping a bit here, Jimmy boy.

You can do better than this.

Look a little harder.

I'm sure you can find newspaper stories that put down General Motors
without you having to add your own editoral section.