View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:33 PM
Scott in Florida
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Why won't Obama go Negative?

On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:30:22 -0700, "Truckdude" <sarah@duh.com> wrote:

>
>"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
>news:BqJHk.2075$hc1.1703@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com.. .
>> With all the lies that McCain and the Republicans have been using on
>> Obama, I don't understand why he doesn't respond with some negative ads of
>> his own. Not more ads that simply tell the truth about John McCain, i.e.
>> the Keating 5 ads, those are ostensibly negative, but they're not
>> personal.
>>
>> McCain and Palin have a _lot_ more personal stiff to go after than
>> something like the whole Ayers schtick.
>>
>> I saw a good YouTube video regarding the whole "family values" and
>> "experience" crap that the neo-cons make noise about whenever Rush and
>> Sean tell them to.
>>
>> "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mg5tl87rEE4"
>>
>> Maybe Obama figures that he's gotten this far ahead by talking about real
>> issues and that responding would lower himself to McCain's level. But he
>> needs to be careful, as the Republicans might come up with lie that works.
>> They did it to Kerry with all the Swift Boat lies, and there were enough
>> stupid people out there that believed them. Are there enough totally
>> clueless people like Mike Hunt, dbu, Mark, Charles, and Scott to turn this
>> thing around for McCain?
>>
>> The other issue Obama needs to worry about is that people are starting to
>> feel sorry for McCain's struggling candidacy and may want to vote for an
>> underdog.

>
>Watch a McCain rally. McCain is imploding all on his own. Just as long as
>the attacks are answered right away, there is no need to sink to McCain's
>level.
>


No answer yet to Ayers....

--

Scott in Florida
Reply With Quote