Re: [OT] Why won't Obama go Negative? In article <49vue4tbifa0drpdlsmad9imuk1b12tg25@4ax.com>,
Scott in Florida <MoveOn@outa.here> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:30:22 -0700, "Truckdude" <sarah@duh.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
> >news:BqJHk.2075$hc1.1703@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com.. .
> >> With all the lies that McCain and the Republicans have been using on
> >> Obama, I don't understand why he doesn't respond with some negative ads of
> >> his own. Not more ads that simply tell the truth about John McCain, i.e.
> >> the Keating 5 ads, those are ostensibly negative, but they're not
> >> personal.
> >>
> >> McCain and Palin have a _lot_ more personal stiff to go after than
> >> something like the whole Ayers schtick.
> >>
> >> I saw a good YouTube video regarding the whole "family values" and
> >> "experience" crap that the neo-cons make noise about whenever Rush and
> >> Sean tell them to.
> >>
> >> "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mg5tl87rEE4"
> >>
> >> Maybe Obama figures that he's gotten this far ahead by talking about real
> >> issues and that responding would lower himself to McCain's level. But he
> >> needs to be careful, as the Republicans might come up with lie that works.
> >> They did it to Kerry with all the Swift Boat lies, and there were enough
> >> stupid people out there that believed them. Are there enough totally
> >> clueless people like Mike Hunt, dbu, Mark, Charles, and Scott to turn this
> >> thing around for McCain?
> >>
> >> The other issue Obama needs to worry about is that people are starting to
> >> feel sorry for McCain's struggling candidacy and may want to vote for an
> >> underdog.
> >
> >Watch a McCain rally. McCain is imploding all on his own. Just as long as
> >the attacks are answered right away, there is no need to sink to McCain's
> >level.
> >
>
> No answer yet to Ayers....
Obama will have an answer for everything when he buys 30 minutes of
prime time on all the TV networks one week from election. They have
money to burn and burn they must because it will become evidence if they
don't get rid of it soon.
-- |