grantbilbrough@hotmail.com wrote:
> > While in second crawling 5+ mph to a red light I floor the go pedal and
> > start releasing the clutch. Is that a bad idea? It's so sloooooow,
> > I would like to hear alternative suggesting for a lauch from crawling
> > speeds.
>
> Maybe this is a question to ask Subaru... or perhaps the engineer that
> designed their transmission!
>
Would not have been as much of a problem if the engine did not take
forever to wind up.
Maybe they should go back to 2.2 or 1.8 liter if they can't make 2.5 a
joy to live with.
Maybe the engineer who designed the transmissions 15 years ago retired
and some clueless slacker replaced him? Plus the marketing folks on
top to tell him what gear ratios to select. All things combined: not so
good
of a car.
> With all of this that is going on I have to wonder if it is worth
> buying another Subaru when I decide to get rid of this one. It all
> makes me question their engineering capabilities on some level.
Well, they are a small-moderate volume manufacturer.
They probably sell as many imprezas including wrx and sti
as honda sells hybrid accords. The latter not being a big seller.
My problem is that I don't think the first gen legacy had all
the problems plaguing impreza today. And it's been 15 years or
so since legacy replaced loyale. So I'm not sure if Subaru
deserves much slack. All I'm asking for is to not get
their cars worse. I would not have been slamming a korean
manufacturer in the same way because what they had
15 years ago was pathetic and whatever they have now is
definitely an improvement. But for Subaru it's odd to see
issues with the basic features (tranny, chassis and engine) of the car.
I'd rather forego creature comforts like cruize control and
power windows/locks to have the basics ironed out.
I guess I was just spoiled by my protege (323 ouside the US).