| alt.autos.subaru alt.autos.subaru newsgroup | 
08-14-2007, 01:49 PM
| | | rear bearings I think I've read about rear bearings going before on this group.
I replaced both rear bearings on my 2003 OBS at about 90k kms. I'm at
146k now and I can hear the bearings again. Why only 55k this time?
The bearings were done by a 3rd party shop last time. Is there a
difference in parts? Any suggestions / comments? It cost me about
$700cdn last time.
Chicobiker | 
08-14-2007, 03:45 PM
| | | Re: rear bearings Are u sure it is the bearings?
55k sounds as too low a mileage for them to fail.
Try swapping the front with the rear tires.
Good luck!
Chicobiker wrote:
> I think I've read about rear bearings going before on this group.
>
> I replaced both rear bearings on my 2003 OBS at about 90k kms. I'm at
> 146k now and I can hear the bearings again. Why only 55k this time?
> The bearings were done by a 3rd party shop last time. Is there a
> difference in parts? Any suggestions / comments? It cost me about
> $700cdn last time.
>
> Chicobiker
> | 
08-14-2007, 05:37 PM
| | | Re: rear bearings Hi Chico!
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:32:23 -0700, Chicobiker <chicobiker@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>I think I've read about rear bearings going before on this group.
>
>I replaced both rear bearings on my 2003 OBS at about 90k kms. I'm at
>146k now and I can hear the bearings again. Why only 55k this time?
>The bearings were done by a 3rd party shop last time. Is there a
>difference in parts? Any suggestions / comments? It cost me about
>$700cdn last time.
>
>Chicobiker
It's real easy to damage the bearings during installation, especially
if you don't have all of the correct adapters for your press. (Same
thing applies for the fronts; _never_ pound on the axle shaft while
attempting to remove it ...)
This damage can be subtle (Microscopic dimples in the race and/or flat
spots on the balls which grow with time. Technical term is
"brinelling"; look it up.), and frequently doesn't make it's self
evident for 10-20K miles.
I promise you this is true; I speak from sad experience :-P
ByeBye! S.
Steve Jernigan KG0MB
Laboratory Manager
Microelectronics Research
University of Colorado
(719) 262-3101 | 
08-14-2007, 05:37 PM
| | | Re: rear bearings S <jernigan@chester.uccs.edu> writes:
> flat spots on the balls which grow with time.
At which time it's appropriate to leave the mechanic and see a
urologist.
Sorry... couldn't resist. Very informative post actually, S!
Best Regards,
--
Todd H.
2001 Legacy Outback Wagon, 2.5L H-4
Chicago, Illinois USA | 
08-14-2007, 09:58 PM
| | | Re: rear bearings
"AS" <donot@spame.com> wrote in message
news:13c3f1f4okpsr2e@corp.supernews.com...
> Are u sure it is the bearings?
>
> 55k sounds as too low a mileage for them to fail.
I had mine go at around 25k miles on an '00 Impreza.
Lots of high speed driving in hot weather, which I suspect
helped kill them.
M.J.
> Try swapping the front with the rear tires.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Chicobiker wrote:
>> I think I've read about rear bearings going before on this group.
>>
>> I replaced both rear bearings on my 2003 OBS at about 90k kms. I'm at
>> 146k now and I can hear the bearings again. Why only 55k this time?
>> The bearings were done by a 3rd party shop last time. Is there a
>> difference in parts? Any suggestions / comments? It cost me about
>> $700cdn last time.
>>
>> Chicobiker
>> | 
08-16-2007, 03:14 PM
| | | Re: rear bearings LOL Todd.
When replacing the bearings, did they replace the bearging hub (as sold
by Subaru) or just the bearings?
Todd H. wrote:
> S <jernigan@chester.uccs.edu> writes:
>
>
>>flat spots on the balls which grow with time.
>
>
> At which time it's appropriate to leave the mechanic and see a
> urologist.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sorry... couldn't resist. Very informative post actually, S!
>
> Best Regards,
> --
> Todd H.
> 2001 Legacy Outback Wagon, 2.5L H-4
> Chicago, Illinois USA | 
08-16-2007, 11:59 PM
| | | Re: rear bearings On Aug 16, 10:51 am, AS <do...@spame.com> wrote:
> LOL Todd.
>
> When replacing the bearings, did they replace the bearging hub (as sold
> by Subaru) or just the bearings?
Not sure what you mean by the hub. Can't picture it. They usually
buy Subaru parts when working on my car.
Can you describe the difference?
>
> Todd H. wrote:
> > S <jerni...@chester.uccs.edu> writes:
>
> >>flat spots on the balls which grow with time.
>
> > At which time it's appropriate to leave the mechanic and see a
> > urologist.
>
> > Sorry... couldn't resist. Very informative post actually, S!
>
> > Best Regards,
> > --
> > Todd H.
> > 2001 Legacy Outback Wagon, 2.5L H-4
> > Chicago, Illinois USA- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text - | 
08-18-2007, 03:09 AM
| | | Re: rear bearings If they got the subaru part, the bearing comes with the hub, you remove
4 bolts, take the old bearing/hub assy and put the new assy in place.
Again, are u sure the problem is not the tires?
Good luck
Chicobiker wrote:
> On Aug 16, 10:51 am, AS <do...@spame.com> wrote:
>
>>LOL Todd.
>>
>>When replacing the bearings, did they replace the bearging hub (as sold
>>by Subaru) or just the bearings?
>
>
> Not sure what you mean by the hub. Can't picture it. They usually
> buy Subaru parts when working on my car.
>
> Can you describe the difference?
>
>
>
>>Todd H. wrote:
>>
>>>S <jerni...@chester.uccs.edu> writes:
>>
>>>>flat spots on the balls which grow with time.
>>
>>>At which time it's appropriate to leave the mechanic and see a
>>>urologist.
>>
>>>Sorry... couldn't resist. Very informative post actually, S!
>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>--
>>>Todd H.
>>>2001 Legacy Outback Wagon, 2.5L H-4
>>>Chicago, Illinois USA- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -
>
>
> | 
09-01-2007, 12:57 AM
| | | Re: rear bearings Chicobiker wrote:
>
> I think I've read about rear bearings going before on this group.
Hi,
Yes, wheel bearings have been problematic and a subject of discussion in
the past...
I have an old Toyota truck (one of the models that just keeps going and
going) and I've often joked that in building that truck, Toyota scoured
the world for all the "best" design ideas in the automotive world, and
incorporated them. Subie followed behind and took the worst!
Ok, that might be a bit harsh, but they certainly screwed the pooch IMHO
on wheel bearings. Somewhere I read that ONE of the causes of early
failures had been pinpointed as faulty seals that allowed water into the
bearing. Then, in earlier discussions, it was revealed that Subaru was
claiming their bearings were "pre-lubed" from the factory and didn't
need additional grease prior to installation. I haven't a clue how many
bearings WERE installed that way, but after discussions about how little
actual grease there was in these bearings, I dismissed that idea as
bogus, especially after I'd bought a Subie bearing and it had little but
corrosion protective grease on it.
Combine a lack of adequate grease w/ a possible incursion of water
and/or dirt, and the bearing's doomed from the start. As for heat, IME a
properly lubed bearing SHOULD be able to go at least 60-100k miles
before needing attention (which SHOULD consist of cleaning and
regreasing, NOT replacement, again IMHO only.) 40 years of driving in
essentially desert conditions (heat-wise, not off road-wise) tell me a
properly lubed bearing shouldn't fail from any heat we normally
encounter. Again, "properly lubed" is an operative term...
Rick | 
09-01-2007, 02:39 AM
| | | Re: rear bearings
"Rick Courtright" <rcourtright@iname.com> wrote in message
news:46D8A55A.EC195FBC@iname.com...
> Chicobiker wrote:
>>
>> I think I've read about rear bearings going before on this group.
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, wheel bearings have been problematic and a subject of discussion in
> the past...
>
> I have an old Toyota truck (one of the models that just keeps going and
> going) and I've often joked that in building that truck, Toyota scoured
> the world for all the "best" design ideas in the automotive world, and
> incorporated them. Subie followed behind and took the worst!
>
> Ok, that might be a bit harsh, but they certainly screwed the pooch IMHO
> on wheel bearings. Somewhere I read that ONE of the causes of early
> failures had been pinpointed as faulty seals that allowed water into the
> bearing. Then, in earlier discussions, it was revealed that Subaru was
> claiming their bearings were "pre-lubed" from the factory and didn't
> need additional grease prior to installation. I haven't a clue how many
> bearings WERE installed that way, but after discussions about how little
> actual grease there was in these bearings, I dismissed that idea as
> bogus, especially after I'd bought a Subie bearing and it had little but
> corrosion protective grease on it.
>
> Combine a lack of adequate grease w/ a possible incursion of water
> and/or dirt, and the bearing's doomed from the start. As for heat, IME a
> properly lubed bearing SHOULD be able to go at least 60-100k miles
> before needing attention (which SHOULD consist of cleaning and
> regreasing, NOT replacement, again IMHO only.) 40 years of driving in
> essentially desert conditions (heat-wise, not off road-wise) tell me a
> properly lubed bearing shouldn't fail from any heat we normally
> encounter. Again, "properly lubed" is an operative term...
>
> Rick
You are correct there Rick....
Subaru builds their cars with a $ sign in mind. CHEAP is where it's at. From
wheel bearings that crap out at 25,000 miles and less, to underpowered
alternators, to paper thin metal used in doors and hoods, to the cheapest
paint known in the automotive fields it's a wonder they can sell these
poorly designed cars.
Phase 1 engines replaced with phase 2 that STILL blow headgaskets! A/C units
that are "Wimpy" to say the least. Roof racks that leak water into the
headliners and tail light assemblies that fill with water due to
cheap/crappy gaskets.
The amazing part is people keep buying this shit!!
But you know...VW is worse.... | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08 AM.
|