California needs to lighten up.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21760350/

*rolling eyes*

Natalie

"Wickeddoll" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1958@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:fha910.340.1@news.evilcabal.org:

> California needs to lighten up.
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21760350/
>
> *rolling eyes*
>
> Natalie
>
>
>


The hardest slap is that...IT'S TRUE. And that's why it HURTS so much.

--
Tegger

Tegger <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in news:Xns99E6D014BC05tegger@
207.14.116.130:

> "Wickeddoll" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1958@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:fha910.340.1@news.evilcabal.org:
>
>> California needs to lighten up.
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21760350/
>>
>> *rolling eyes*
>>
>> Natalie
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> The hardest slap is that...IT'S TRUE. And that's why it HURTS so much.
>



And hey, it's VERY obvious that Sen. Dimwit Feinstein is wholly unfamiliar
with the spirit of the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which she
pledged to uhold when she became a Senator. Par for the course for a
Democrat, of course...

--
Tegger

"Tegger" ...
>
>> "Wickeddoll"
>>
>>> California needs to lighten up.
>>>
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21760350/
>>>
>>> *rolling eyes*
>>>
>>> Natalie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> The hardest slap is that...IT'S TRUE. And that's why it HURTS so much.
>>
>
>
>
> And hey, it's VERY obvious that Sen. Dimwit Feinstein is wholly unfamiliar
> with the spirit of the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which she
> pledged to uhold when she became a Senator. Par for the course for a
> Democrat, of course...
>
> --
> Tegger
>

I don't have anything against Feinstein, but I think there are much more
important things for legislators to deal with, than car commercials.

Geeze, these people are overpaid and underworked.

Natalie

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:49:04 -0500, "Wickeddoll"
<wickeddollnofeckingspam1958@yahoo.com> wrote:

>I don't have anything against Feinstein, but I think there are much more
>important things for legislators to deal with, than car commercials.
>
>Geeze, these people are overpaid and underworked.

I don't want them to 'work' any harder....

When they 'work' the country suffers.


>
>Natalie
>
--
Scott in Florida

"Wickeddoll" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1958@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:fhacak.3m8.1@news.evilcabal.org:

> It was ultimately Toyota's
> choice to pull the ad - she had no power to stop it.
>


But would Toyota have pulled the ad if Senator Feinstein hadn't called
them? What if you had called them as a (powerless) private citizen?


--
Tegger

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:49:04 -0500, Wickeddoll wrote:

>> And hey, it's VERY obvious that Sen. Dimwit Feinstein is wholly
>> unfamiliar with the spirit of the First Amendment of the US
>> Constitution, which she pledged to uhold when she became a Senator. Par
>> for the course for a Democrat, of course...
>>
>> --
>> Tegger
>>
>>
> I don't have anything against Feinstein, but I think there are much more
> important things for legislators to deal with, than car commercials.


You're talking a person who's greatest amount of effort went into telling
allies they're @$$hole$ (Japan: Apologize for WWII atrocites against the
Koreans, and Turkey, the 1917 actions against the Kurds...)

That's only 60 years in the past, and 90 years in the past. Guess they
figure they can't *really* get anything worthwhile done, so they chase
after ghosts...

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 02:09:24 +0000, Tegger wrote:

> This has nothing to do with Dianne Feinsten as a person; it has everything
> to do with Dianne Feinstein as a legislatrix and arbitratrix of your
> personal freedom, and of the freedom of all other American citizens.


Tegger, try "Queen".

"Hachiroku ????"
Tegger wrote:
>
>> This has nothing to do with Dianne Feinsten as a person; it has
>> everything
>> to do with Dianne Feinstein as a legislatrix and arbitratrix of your
>> personal freedom, and of the freedom of all other American citizens.
>
>
> Tegger, try "Queen".
>
>
I don't see it as a First Amendment violation so much as political
posturing.

Natalie

"Tegger" ...
> "Wickeddoll" :
>
>> It was ultimately Toyota's
>> choice to pull the ad - she had no power to stop it.
>>
>
>
> But would Toyota have pulled the ad if Senator Feinstein hadn't called
> them? What if you had called them as a (powerless) private citizen?
>
>
> --
> Tegger
>
I think that if a petition was started by Fresnoans, they would have done
the same thing. Yes, her position had a lot to do with it, but my point is
that it was still up to Toyota to pull the ad.

It's not like she could sue them or anything.

Natalie