http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/us...gewanted=print

http://tinyurl.com/24645w

The liberal rag...the New Yanker Times......

'Mrs. Clinton is a long way from winning the Democratic presidential
nomination, and over the last few weeks has struggled to hang on to the air
of inevitability that she has been cultivating all year. But the possibility
that she will be the nominee is already generating concern among some
Democrats in Republican-leaning states and Congressional districts, who fear
that sharing the ticket with her could subject them to attack as too liberal
and out of step with the values of their constituents.'

--
Scott in Florida

Scott in Florida, 12/4/2007,8:38:57 AM, wrote:

> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/us...tml?ei=5065&en
> =9946eb5ce86243c5&ex=1197349200&partner=MYWAY&adxn nlx=1196745143-ajadP
> v49x8hpb%20YtHTdo%20Q&pagewanted=print
>
> http://tinyurl.com/24645w
>
> The liberal rag...the New Yanker Times......
>
> 'Mrs. Clinton is a long way from winning the Democratic presidential
> nomination, and over the last few weeks has struggled to hang on to
> the air of inevitability that she has been cultivating all year. But
> the possibility that she will be the nominee is already generating
> concern among some Democrats in Republican-leaning states and
> Congressional districts, who fear that sharing the ticket with her
> could subject them to attack as too liberal and out of step with the
> values of their constituents.'

It appears her house is crumbling from within. Maybe there is no need
for attack ads against her. Besides, conservatives are not very good
at that sort of thing anyway. We are much better at holding people up
and making them be hopeful. It is the Democrats who are masters of
misinformation and gutter politics or making people feel bad about
themselves and the world. Let them do our dirty work I say. They seem
to be doing pretty well already.

--
"Any political party that includes the word 'democratic' in its name,
isn't." ~ Patrick Murray

On 2007-12-04 05:57:01 -0800, "badgolferman"
<REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> said:

> It appears her house is crumbling from within.

As does any with no foundation. When your "core values" are as
temporal or transitional as the wind, what can you expect in politics?

> Maybe there is no need
> for attack ads against her. Besides, conservatives are not very good
> at that sort of thing anyway. We are much better at holding people up
> and making them be hopeful. It is the Democrats who are masters of
> misinformation and gutter politics or making people feel bad about
> themselves and the world. Let them do our dirty work I say. They seem
> to be doing pretty well already.

Self-destruction does appear to be her fate. Very appropriate, as I'm
still astounded as to the Clinton longevity in the public eye. It's
boggling to see just how long it takes for the public to notice the
naked Emperor.

witfal wrote:

> Self-destruction does appear to be her fate. Very appropriate, as I'm
> still astounded as to the Clinton longevity in the public eye. It's
> boggling to see just how long it takes for the public to notice the
> naked Emperor.

She's no worse than any of the other candidates, and I don't mean
that's a good thing.

On 2007-12-04 21:30:53 -0800, "larry moe 'n curly"
<larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> said:

> witfal wrote:
>
>> Self-destruction does appear to be her fate. Very appropriate, as I'm
>> still astounded as to the Clinton longevity in the public eye. It's
>> boggling to see just how long it takes for the public to notice the
>> naked Emperor.
>
> She's no worse than any of the other candidates, and I don't mean
> that's a good thing.

If you replace "any" with "most", I agree.

Huckabee ate Blitzer's lunch, with Blitzer not being able to get away
from him fast enough. Great to watch.