| alt.autos.toyota alt.autos.toyota newsgroup | 
12-06-2007, 06:45 PM
| | | Mike Suck-abee Seems the tax-raisin', illegal-lovin' weight-loser has added toe-sucking to
his list of undesirable fetishes. He's hired Dick Morris. | 
12-06-2007, 07:39 PM
| | | Re: Mike Suck-abee Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute wrote:
> Seems the tax-raisin', illegal-lovin' weight-loser has added toe-sucking to
> his list of undesirable fetishes. He's hired Dick Morris.
The kiss of death. | 
12-06-2007, 08:36 PM
| | | Re: Mike Suck-abee In article <Xns99FE86F3198DFFredGarvin@66.250.146.128>,
"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" <nospam@whitehouse.gov> wrote:
> Seems the tax-raisin', illegal-lovin' weight-loser has added toe-sucking to
> his list of undesirable fetishes. He's hired Dick Morris.
You mean huckleberry fin Huckabee?
I'm afraid he too will not be elected.
Bad traits are:
He's from Hope Ak.
He plays a guitar
He's a preacher
He's a foodaholic
He's too easy on the illegal swimmers
The name don't jive.
And he raised taxes.
--
"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers.
We are the president."
Hillary Clinton | 
12-06-2007, 09:42 PM
| | | Re: Mike Suck-abee On 2007-12-06 11:58:26 -0800, "dbu." <nospam@nospam.moc> said:
> You mean huckleberry fin Huckabee?
>
> I'm afraid he too will not be elected.
Who would you rather see, and why? | 
12-06-2007, 10:46 PM
| | | Re: Mike Suck-abee In article <fj9nlr$k4$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal <nospam@all4.me>
wrote:
> On 2007-12-06 11:58:26 -0800, "dbu." <nospam@nospam.moc> said:
> > You mean huckleberry fin Huckabee?
> >
> > I'm afraid he too will not be elected.
>
> Who would you rather see, and why?
I would rather see Fred Thompson, but I know he won't get the
nomination. Rudy is the only one who can beat the billary. I like
Rudy, he has a couple of rough spots, but I can live with them.
--
"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers.
We are the president."
Hillary Clinton | 
12-06-2007, 10:46 PM
| | | Re: Mike Suck-abee On 2007-12-06 13:57:05 -0800, "dbu." <nospam@nospam.moc> said:
> In article <fj9nlr$k4$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal <nospam@all4.me>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2007-12-06 11:58:26 -0800, "dbu." <nospam@nospam.moc> said:
>>> You mean huckleberry fin Huckabee?
>>>
>>> I'm afraid he too will not be elected.
>>
>> Who would you rather see, and why?
>
> I would rather see Fred Thompson, but I know he won't get the
> nomination. Rudy is the only one who can beat the billary. I like
> Rudy, he has a couple of rough spots, but I can live with them.
Not me. I will VERY reluctantly vote for him should he get the
nomination. He's too anti-gun.
Bush's lasting legacy, for lack of anything else, is SCOTUS. Our
country at least has a future with his appointments. | 
12-06-2007, 11:30 PM
| | | Re: Mike Suck-abee In article <fj9su3$e9l$2@news.albasani.net>, witfal <nospam@all4.me>
wrote:
> On 2007-12-06 13:57:05 -0800, "dbu." <nospam@nospam.moc> said:
>
> > In article <fj9nlr$k4$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal <nospam@all4.me>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 2007-12-06 11:58:26 -0800, "dbu." <nospam@nospam.moc> said:
> >>> You mean huckleberry fin Huckabee?
> >>>
> >>> I'm afraid he too will not be elected.
> >>
> >> Who would you rather see, and why?
> >
> > I would rather see Fred Thompson, but I know he won't get the
> > nomination. Rudy is the only one who can beat the billary. I like
> > Rudy, he has a couple of rough spots, but I can live with them.
>
> Not me. I will VERY reluctantly vote for him should he get the
> nomination. He's too anti-gun.
How is he anti gun?
>
> Bush's lasting legacy, for lack of anything else, is SCOTUS. Our
> country at least has a future with his appointments.
GWB has been a great president. I wish we could have him for 8 more
years. We'd get the terrorists and get the nation back on track again.
It takes some time to get stuff fixed after liberals have been in
control for so long.
--
"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers.
We are the president."
Hillary Clinton | 
12-06-2007, 11:30 PM
| | | Re: Mike Suck-abee On 2007-12-06 14:44:01 -0800, "dbu." <nospam@nospam.moc> said:
>> Not me. I will VERY reluctantly vote for him should he get the
>> nomination. He's too anti-gun.
>
> How is he anti gun?
Wow. Are you serious? Have a look at his history as NYC's mayor. | 
12-06-2007, 11:30 PM
| | | Re: Mike Suck-abee In article <fj9u5i$hg6$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal <nospam@all4.me>
wrote:
> On 2007-12-06 14:44:01 -0800, "dbu." <nospam@nospam.moc> said:
>
> >> Not me. I will VERY reluctantly vote for him should he get the
> >> nomination. He's too anti-gun.
> >
> > How is he anti gun?
>
> Wow. Are you serious? Have a look at his history as NYC's mayor.
Fill me in. Just a overview, Be sure to cite your source. I'll have a
look-see. Maybe Rudy is not my type either.
--
"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers.
We are the president."
Hillary Clinton | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 04:24 AM.
|