Kerry took the bet.

Has he proved his case?

http://www.johnkerry.com/2007/11/16/...e-for-veterans

http://tinyurl.com/2bw66q

Could this be like my bet with the two sanctimonious
pricks on here?



--
Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <JustAskl@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:lpf7p398mgu2i8e9jj7sapq7jnue8osh4u@4ax.com...
> Kerry took the bet.
>
> Has he proved his case?
>
> http://www.johnkerry.com/2007/11/16/...e-for-veterans
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2bw66q
>
> Could this be like my bet with the two sanctimonious
> pricks on here?
>
>
>
> --
> Scott in Florida

I see only one prick on this newsgroup, and until you returned recently
(from the "home"?) we had none and were getting along swimmingly.

In article <13p7isa1moveif3@corp.supernews.com>,
"mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> "Scott in Florida" <JustAskl@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:lpf7p398mgu2i8e9jj7sapq7jnue8osh4u@4ax.com...
> > Kerry took the bet.
> >
> > Has he proved his case?
> >
> > http://www.johnkerry.com/2007/11/16/...ar-challenge-f
> > or-veterans
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/2bw66q
> >
> > Could this be like my bet with the two sanctimonious
> > pricks on here?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Scott in Florida
>
> I see only one prick on this newsgroup, and until you returned recently
> (from the "home"?) we had none and were getting along swimmingly.

How ya doing you old buzzard? The BP still ok? How's the prostate?
--


"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

Hillary Clinton

On 2008-01-20 14:30:29 -0800, "mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com> said:

>
> "Scott in Florida" <JustAskl@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:lpf7p398mgu2i8e9jj7sapq7jnue8osh4u@4ax.com...
>> Kerry took the bet.
>>
>> Has he proved his case?
>>
>> http://www.johnkerry.com/2007/11/16/...e-for-veterans

http://tinyurl.com/2bw66q

Could
>>
>> this be like my bet with the two sanctimonious
>> pricks on here?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Scott in Florida
>
> I see only one prick on this newsgroup, and until you returned recently
> (from the "home"?) we had none and were getting along swimmingly.

I haven't noticed any real trouble. Just a return of a very small,
insignificant, intellectually deficient rise in the signal-to-noise
ratio in the "return".

"witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
news:fn0jnc$l0b$1@news.albasani.net...
> On 2008-01-20 14:30:29 -0800, "mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com> said:
>
>>
>> "Scott in Florida" <JustAskl@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:lpf7p398mgu2i8e9jj7sapq7jnue8osh4u@4ax.com...
>>> Kerry took the bet.
>>>
>>> Has he proved his case?
>>>
>>> http://www.johnkerry.com/2007/11/16/...e-for-veterans
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2bw66q
>
> Could
>>>
>>> this be like my bet with the two sanctimonious
>>> pricks on here?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Scott in Florida
>>
>> I see only one prick on this newsgroup, and until you returned recently
>> (from the "home"?) we had none and were getting along swimmingly.
>
> I haven't noticed any real trouble. Just a return of a very small,
> insignificant, intellectually deficient rise in the signal-to-noise ratio
> in the "return".
>


Did you ever pith frogs in biology class? If not, here's the definition:

1 a: to kill (as cattle) by piercing or severing the spinal cord b: to
destroy the spinal cord or central nervous system of (as a frog) usually by
passing a wire or needle up and down the vertebral canal

Wanna pay a little visit to Scott? I'll pay for the charter fishing
afterward. You get the beer and the first two dinners.

On 2008-01-20 15:04:45 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> said:

>> I haven't noticed any real trouble. Just a return of a very small,
>> insignificant, intellectually deficient rise in the signal-to-noise ratio
>> in the "return".
>>
>
>
> Did you ever pith frogs in biology class? If not, here's the definition:
>
> 1 a: to kill (as cattle) by piercing or severing the spinal cord b: to
> destroy the spinal cord or central nervous system of (as a frog) usually by
> passing a wire or needle up and down the vertebral canal.

Judging by his posts I saw "B.K." (Before Killfile), I'd have thought
this had already been done. And in an even farther anterior direction.

> Wanna pay a little visit to Scott? I'll pay for the charter fishing
> afterward. You get the beer and the first two dinners.

Shark?

"witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
news:fn0ker$nd3$1@news.albasani.net...
> On 2008-01-20 15:04:45 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com>
> said:
>
>>> I haven't noticed any real trouble. Just a return of a very small,
>>> insignificant, intellectually deficient rise in the signal-to-noise
>>> ratio
>>> in the "return".
>>>
>>
>>
>> Did you ever pith frogs in biology class? If not, here's the definition:
>>
>> 1 a: to kill (as cattle) by piercing or severing the spinal cord b: to
>> destroy the spinal cord or central nervous system of (as a frog) usually
>> by
>> passing a wire or needle up and down the vertebral canal.
>
> Judging by his posts I saw "B.K." (Before Killfile), I'd have thought this
> had already been done. And in an even farther anterior direction.
>
>> Wanna pay a little visit to Scott? I'll pay for the charter fishing
>> afterward. You get the beer and the first two dinners.
>
> Shark?
>


The fishing, or the dinners?

"witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
news:fn0sl0$cg4$1@news.albasani.net...
> On 2008-01-20 15:45:10 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com>
> said:
>
>>> Judging by his posts I saw "B.K." (Before Killfile), I'd have thought
>>> this
>>> had already been done. And in an even farther anterior direction.
>>>
>>>> Wanna pay a little visit to Scott? I'll pay for the charter fishing
>>>> afterward. You get the beer and the first two dinners.
>>>
>>> Shark?
>>>
>>
>>
>> The fishing, or the dinners?
>
> Why exclude either?
>


Shark could be an interesting option for the "pithing".

On 2008-01-20 22:08:37 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> said:

>>>> Shark?
>>>
>>> The fishing, or the dinners?
>>
>> Why exclude either?
>
> Shark could be an interesting option for the "pithing".

Trolling for shark, using pre-pithed bait.

And here you thought he'd never serve any useful purpose.

Scott in Florida wrote:

> Could this be like my bet with the two sanctimonious pricks on here?

I'll bet you $500,000. I won. Pay up now, loser.