http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D8UBA8Q80.html

Enjoy boasting

Tom

"tak" ...
> http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D8UBA8Q80.html
>
> Enjoy boasting
>
> Tom
>

Don't encourage him.

:-P

Natalie

"Wickeddoll®" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1958@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fn5loq.3jo.1@news.evilcabal.org...
>
> "tak" ...
>> http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D8UBA8Q80.html
>>
>> Enjoy boasting
>>
>> Tom
>>
>
> Don't encourage him.
>
> :-P
>
> Natalie
>
He'll have a tough time with that article, he'll have to rely on straight
jingoism.

tak, 1/22/2008,9:46:15 PM, wrote:

> http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D8UBA8Q80.html
>
> Enjoy boasting
>
> Tom

First of all who are those two organizations and when do you think we
will find out George Soros or someone like that is funding them?

Secondly, the statements about Iraq having WMDs was not false at the
time and I believe still is not false today. All intelligence
organizations agreed that was the case and had unequivocal proof at the
time. Just because nothing turned up doesn't mean Saddam Hussein
didn't have them and transported them to friendly nations such as Syria.

Thirdly, Al-Qaeda did have ties to Saddam Hussein if not overtly then
certainly covertly. It is already known Hussein was paying
Palestinians who were blowing up themselves among crowded restaurants
in Israel. He certainly had the will and the means to extend that
generosity to our shores and was most certainly making plans to do such.

The war in Iraq is just an extension of a larger War on Terror. The
main front is currently there but there are many more subversive
clashes going on all over the world. Don't believe everything you read
in the papers. The real story takes a long time to eventually come to
light. Don't get too excited about these "studies" anyway. If there
was really something to them you can bet your entire life savings
Congress would be using them to bring the administration down.

By the way, why is it the media never gets on Colin Powell's case? He
has as much responibility for promoting the war as anyone else.

--
"Every government is run by liars and nothing they say should be
believed." ~ I.F. Stone

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0fli3jm1ixvqy000@news.readfreenews.net...
> tak, 1/22/2008,9:46:15 PM, wrote:
>
>> http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D8UBA8Q80.html
>>
>> Enjoy boasting
>>
>> Tom
>
> First of all who are those two organizations and when do you think we
> will find out George Soros or someone like that is funding them?
>
> Secondly, the statements about Iraq having WMDs was not false at the
> time and I believe still is not false today. All intelligence
> organizations agreed that was the case and had unequivocal proof at the
> time. Just because nothing turned up doesn't mean Saddam Hussein
> didn't have them and transported them to friendly nations such as Syria.
>
> Thirdly, Al-Qaeda did have ties to Saddam Hussein if not overtly then
> certainly covertly. It is already known Hussein was paying
> Palestinians who were blowing up themselves among crowded restaurants
> in Israel. He certainly had the will and the means to extend that
> generosity to our shores and was most certainly making plans to do such.
>
> The war in Iraq is just an extension of a larger War on Terror. The
> main front is currently there but there are many more subversive
> clashes going on all over the world. Don't believe everything you read
> in the papers. The real story takes a long time to eventually come to
> light. Don't get too excited about these "studies" anyway. If there
> was really something to them you can bet your entire life savings
> Congress would be using them to bring the administration down.
>
> By the way, why is it the media never gets on Colin Powell's case? He
> has as much responibility for promoting the war as anyone else.
>
> --
> "Every government is run by liars and nothing they say should be
> believed." ~ I.F. Stone

Thank you for holding the fort for Scott. It must be very hard to face the
failures of Bush after having invested so much of yourself in support of his
administration.

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0fli3wq1jgtsf001@news.readfreenews.net...
> tak, 1/22/2008,10:36:05 PM, wrote:
>
>>
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:xn0fli3jm1ixvqy000@news.readfreenews.net...
>> > tak, 1/22/2008,9:46:15 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> > > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D8UBA8Q80.html
>> > >
>> > > Enjoy boasting
>> > >
>> > > Tom
>> >
>> > First of all who are those two organizations and when do you think
>> > we will find out George Soros or someone like that is funding them?
>> >
>> > Secondly, the statements about Iraq having WMDs was not false at the
>> > time and I believe still is not false today. All intelligence
>> > organizations agreed that was the case and had unequivocal proof at
>> > the time. Just because nothing turned up doesn't mean Saddam
>> > Hussein didn't have them and transported them to friendly nations
>> > such as Syria.
>> >
>> > Thirdly, Al-Qaeda did have ties to Saddam Hussein if not overtly
>> > then certainly covertly. It is already known Hussein was paying
>> > Palestinians who were blowing up themselves among crowded
>> > restaurants in Israel. He certainly had the will and the means to
>> > extend that generosity to our shores and was most certainly making
>> > plans to do such.
>> >
>> > The war in Iraq is just an extension of a larger War on Terror. The
>> > main front is currently there but there are many more subversive
>> > clashes going on all over the world. Don't believe everything you
>> > read in the papers. The real story takes a long time to eventually
>> > come to light. Don't get too excited about these "studies" anyway.
>> > If there was really something to them you can bet your entire life
>> > savings Congress would be using them to bring the administration
>> > down.
>> >
>> > By the way, why is it the media never gets on Colin Powell's case?
>> > He has as much responibility for promoting the war as anyone else.
>> >
>> > -- "Every government is run by liars and nothing they say should be
>> > believed." ~ I.F. Stone
>>
>> Thank you for holding the fort for Scott. It must be very hard to
>> face the failures of Bush after having invested so much of yourself
>> in support of his administration.
>
> What failures? He's kept your head from being cut off by a bunch or
> radical Moslems. He's corrected the failures of the Clinton
> Administration who let these people roam free for 8 years, attacking
> America all over the world, including the 1993 WTC attacks. How can
> you say that with a straight face? You really must be using selective
> memory or are truly blinded by hate.
>
> --
> "Bill Clinton's foreign policy experience is pretty much limited to
> having had breakfast once at the International House of Pancakes." ~
> Pat Buchanan

Hate, no. Disappointment (in the extreme).

If Bush were as good as you say, why won't the current Republican candidates
for the office have anything to do with him while campaigning, hmmmm?

tak, 1/22/2008,10:56:42 PM, wrote:

> If Bush were as good as you say, why won't the current Republican
> candidates for the office have anything to do with him while
> campaigning, hmmmm?

You can leave Ron Paul out of this since he isn't really a Republican
anyway. He is a Libertarian and in my view short-sighted regarding the
War on Terror. Besides I'd bet he would sing a different tune if
actually faced with making the hard decisions Bush has been forced to
make.

I don't spend much time listening to the candidates these days since I
actually have a life but it seems to me Giuliani, Thompson, and McCain
all support the war. Romney I have no idea since he changes his
position constantly. Huckabee seems to be the most liberal of the lot.
He's actually much like Bush, socially conservative but fiscally
liberal.

At the end of the day whoever becomes President is obligated to defend
Americans from the threat of radical Islam. If push comes to shove
even Obama or Clinton will do whatever necessary to keep the fight away
from our homeland. So far Bush has done that one thing well.

--
"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." ~ Alexander Hamilton

"tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:XTxlj.2678$7d1.1343@news01.roc.ny...
> http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D8UBA8Q80.html
>
> Enjoy boasting
>
> Tom


During the Reagan presidency, the CIA had perfect information about
Pakistan's nuclear weapons development. This had to be kept quiet to avoid
embarrassing Reagan, who insisted that Pakistan was behaving itself. This
enabled Reagan to publicly declare that it was fine for us to continue
providing Pakistan with weapons and cash.

In order to maintain the lie, the intelligence had to be cooked, not just to
keep Reagan happy, but to avoid the truth to leak to the press. One of the
primary chefs in the kitchen was none other than Cheney (assisted by Paul
Wolfowitz). So, it should come as no surprise to anyone that the same chef
was at work in the Bush-2 administration.

This should also cast doubts on anything Bush says about Iran's nuclear
program.

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0fli3wq1jgtsf001@news.readfreenews.net...

>> Thank you for holding the fort for Scott. It must be very hard to
>> face the failures of Bush after having invested so much of yourself
>> in support of his administration.
>
> What failures? He's kept your head from being cut off by a bunch or
> radical Moslems.


Here we go again. What specific measures has Bush taken to keep our heads
from being cut off by radical Muslims?



> He's corrected the failures of the Clinton
> Administration who let these people roam free for 8 years, attacking
> America all over the world, including the 1993 WTC attacks. How can
> you say that with a straight face? You really must be using selective
> memory or are truly blinded by hate.


Unfortunately for you, the failures you describe were not failures. Rather,
they were part of a carefully orchestrated plan which began in a small way
with Carter, and were turned into a machine to big to stop by Reagan and
Bush-1, with slimy assistance behind the scenes from Cheney and Wolfowitz,
who've been pulling strings for many, many years, unbeknownst to you.

In article <R2Glj.2699$7d1.2275@news01.roc.ny>,
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote:


> Here we go again. What specific measures has Bush taken to keep our heads
> from being cut off by radical Muslims?

Unless you have a security clearance I doubt you will be able to find
out specific information about how we keep terrorists at bay here in the
U.S.

Why do continue to ask the same questions over and over again?
--


"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

Hillary Clinton