| alt.autos.toyota alt.autos.toyota newsgroup | 
02-20-2008, 10:54 AM
| | | (OT:) WHY didn't Condoleeza run? She has what the voters want:
she's black, so the Obama supporters will vote for her.
She's a woman, so the Hillary supporters will vote for her.
She's conservative, so the Republicans will vote for her.
Not only that, she's so HOT she makes Hillary look like: http://www.funnyphotos.net.au/userim...1168230825.JPG | 
02-20-2008, 12:03 PM
| | | Re: (OT:) WHY didn't Condoleeza run? In article <pan.2008.02.20.10.48.52.687000@ae86.gts>,
Hachiroku <Hachiroku_ae86@ae86.gts> wrote:
> She has what the voters want:
>
> she's black, so the Obama supporters will vote for her.
> She's a woman, so the Hillary supporters will vote for her.
> She's conservative, so the Republicans will vote for her.
>
> Not only that, she's so HOT she makes Hillary look like:
>
> http://www.funnyphotos.net.au/userim...1168230825.JPG
Like so many other overly qualified people, I don't think she wants the
job.
--
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
Hillary Clinton | 
02-20-2008, 12:03 PM
| | | Re: (OT:) WHY didn't Condoleeza run? Bush baggage, that's why.
Hachiroku wrote:
> She has what the voters want:
>
> she's black, so the Obama supporters will vote for her.
> She's a woman, so the Hillary supporters will vote for her.
No stereotypes there in your thinking.
> She's conservative, so the Republicans will vote for her.
As conservative as a McCain Republican, meaning no enthusiasm from the
rabid Bush/Reagan conservatives.
> Not only that, she's so HOT she makes Hillary look like:
>
> http://www.funnyphotos.net.au/userim...1168230825.JPG
Condi is so hot looking that when she walks into a room, all the guys
turn their heads toward her and think, "wow, that woman sure is
smart." The angry chipmunk face doesn't help her either. | 
02-20-2008, 06:31 PM
| | | Re: (OT:) WHY didn't Condoleeza run? Hachiroku wrote:
> She has what the voters want:
>
> she's black, so the Obama supporters will vote for her.
> She's a woman, so the Hillary supporters will vote for her.
> She's conservative, so the Republicans will vote for her.
Its a case of let "sleeping dogs lie." The last thing the Republicans
want is to get their 9/11 *incompetence* (to put in mildly) back in the
news. Like Gonzales and so many others touched by Bush and Rove, Condi
is toast. Back to the oil business for her, and none too soon. http://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/30/zelikow-interfered/ | 
02-20-2008, 06:31 PM
| | | Re: (OT:) WHY didn't Condoleeza run?
"Hachiroku" <...
> She has what the voters want:
>
> she's black, so the Obama supporters will vote for her.
*snip*
Not all blacks are voting for him.
:-P
Natalie | 
02-20-2008, 07:33 PM
| | | Re: (OT:) WHY didn't Condoleeza run? In article <fph3j4.3ms.1@news.evilcabal.org>,
"Wickeddoll®" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1958@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Hachiroku" <...
> > She has what the voters want:
> >
> > she's black, so the Obama supporters will vote for her.
>
> *snip*
>
> Not all blacks are voting for him.
>
> :-P
>
> Natalie
And not all women are voting for hillary.
--
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
Hillary Clinton | 
02-20-2008, 10:32 PM
| | | Re: (OT:) WHY didn't Condoleeza run? On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:28:08 +0000, F.H. wrote:
> Hachiroku wrote:
>> She has what the voters want:
>>
>> she's black, so the Obama supporters will vote for her. She's a woman,
>> so the Hillary supporters will vote for her. She's conservative, so the
>> Republicans will vote for her.
>
> Its a case of let "sleeping dogs lie." The last thing the Republicans
> want is to get their 9/11 *incompetence* (to put in mildly) back in the
> news. Like Gonzales and so many others touched by Bush and Rove, Condi is
> toast. Back to the oil business for her, and none too soon.
>
> http://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/30/zelikow-interfered/
Hillary doesn't have any baggage? | 
02-20-2008, 10:32 PM
| | | Re: (OT:) WHY didn't Condoleeza run? Bush baggage, that's why. On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:38:10 -0800, manny wrote:
>
>
> Hachiroku wrote:
>
>> She has what the voters want:
>>
>> she's black, so the Obama supporters will vote for her. She's a woman,
>> so the Hillary supporters will vote for her.
>
> No stereotypes there in your thinking.
It's a joke, I say, it's a *JOKE*, son!
>
>> She's conservative, so the Republicans will vote for her.
>
> As conservative as a McCain Republican, meaning no enthusiasm from the
> rabid Bush/Reagan conservatives.
>
>> Not only that, she's so HOT she makes Hillary look like:
>>
>> http://www.funnyphotos.net.au/userim...1168230825.JPG
>
> Condi is so hot looking that when she walks into a room, all the guys turn
> their heads toward her and think, "wow, that woman sure is smart." The
> angry chipmunk face doesn't help her either. | 
02-20-2008, 10:32 PM
| | | Re: (OT:) WHY didn't Condoleeza run? On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:24:11 -0500, Mark A wrote:
> "Hachiroku" <Hachiroku_ae86@ae86.gts> wrote in message
> news an.2008.02.20.10.48.52.687000@ae86.gts...
>> She has what the voters want:
>>
>> she's black, so the Obama supporters will vote for her. She's a woman,
>> so the Hillary supporters will vote for her. She's conservative, so the
>> Republicans will vote for her.
>>
>> Not only that, she's so HOT she makes Hillary look like:
>>
>> http://www.funnyphotos.net.au/userim...1168230825.JPG
>
> She has never held any elected office at any level. Some people want to
> see that before they vote for a presidential candidate.
Secretary of State is good for me!
Fact is, NO Secratary of State has ever held the Presidency. | 
02-20-2008, 10:32 PM
| | | Re: (OT:) WHY didn't Condoleeza run? Hachiroku ãƒãƒãƒ*ク wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:28:08 +0000, F.H. wrote:
>
>> Hachiroku wrote:
>>> She has what the voters want:
>>>
>>> she's black, so the Obama supporters will vote for her. She's a woman,
>>> so the Hillary supporters will vote for her. She's conservative, so the
>>> Republicans will vote for her.
>> Its a case of let "sleeping dogs lie." The last thing the Republicans
>> want is to get their 9/11 *incompetence* (to put in mildly) back in the
>> news. Like Gonzales and so many others touched by Bush and Rove, Condi is
>> toast. Back to the oil business for her, and none too soon.
>>
>> http://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/30/zelikow-interfered/
>
>
> Hillary doesn't have any baggage?
Non Sequitur, but since you bring it up, not that kind. No one has
*that* kind except the inner circle of the Bush Admin. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 03:03 AM.
|