| alt.autos.toyota alt.autos.toyota newsgroup | 
02-23-2008, 12:45 AM
| | | OT - No liberal bias? | 
02-23-2008, 01:35 AM
| | | Re: OT - No liberal bias? "witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
news:fpnprh$5v0$1@news.albasani.net...
> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories
>
> for
> the copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf
>
Oh boy....
Even though it's obvious what you're thinking, please tell me in your own
words why you think one or more of the articles has a liberal bias.
*****BUT******
Pretend you're writing your response as an assignment for a journalism
class, in which you have been asked to analyze three similar articles. Your
professor is David Berkowitz aka "Son of Sam", sitting right behind you with
a .44 magnum tucked firmly into that notch at the back of your head where it
meets your neck.
Make it good. | 
02-23-2008, 01:35 AM
| | | Re: OT - No liberal bias? On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:13:55 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> "witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
> news:fpnprh$5v0$1@news.albasani.net...
>> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories
>>
>> for
>> the copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf
>>
>>
>
>
> Oh boy....
>
> Even though it's obvious what you're thinking, please tell me in your own
> words why you think one or more of the articles has a liberal bias.
Hmmmm....perhaps a bit of "Political Correctness"?
I mean, we all know that illegal immigrants are so put upon society as it
is, and this would only raise more ire against them.
Not only that, but it is not correct to 'profile' someone this way.
Could lead to prejudice.
BTW, did the poor woman who hit the bus HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE?!?!?!
or INSURANCE?!?!?! | 
02-23-2008, 01:35 AM
| | | Re: OT - No liberal bias? "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
news:vxKvj.28$o23.10@trndny09...
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:13:55 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
>> "witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
>> news:fpnprh$5v0$1@news.albasani.net...
>>> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>>>
>>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>>>
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>>>
>>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories
>>>
>>> for
>>> the copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Oh boy....
>>
>> Even though it's obvious what you're thinking, please tell me in your own
>> words why you think one or more of the articles has a liberal bias.
>
>
> Hmmmm....perhaps a bit of "Political Correctness"?
>
> I mean, we all know that illegal immigrants are so put upon society as it
> is, and this would only raise more ire against them.
>
> Not only that, but it is not correct to 'profile' someone this way.
> Could lead to prejudice.
>
> BTW, did the poor woman who hit the bus HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE?!?!?!
> or INSURANCE?!?!?!
Who asked you? I asked witfal, who is capable of remaining focused on the
questions being asked. You are static. | 
02-23-2008, 02:30 AM
| | | Re: OT - No liberal bias? On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:22:56 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
> news:vxKvj.28$o23.10@trndny09...
>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:13:55 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>
>>> "witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
>>> news:fpnprh$5v0$1@news.albasani.net...
>>>> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories
>>>>
>>>> for
>>>> the copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh boy....
>>>
>>> Even though it's obvious what you're thinking, please tell me in your
>>> own words why you think one or more of the articles has a liberal bias.
>>
>>
>> Hmmmm....perhaps a bit of "Political Correctness"?
>>
>> I mean, we all know that illegal immigrants are so put upon society as
>> it is, and this would only raise more ire against them.
>>
>> Not only that, but it is not correct to 'profile' someone this way.
>> Could lead to prejudice.
>>
>> BTW, did the poor woman who hit the bus HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE?!?!?! or
>> INSURANCE?!?!?!
>
>
> Who asked you? I asked witfal, who is capable of remaining focused on the
> questions being asked. You are static.
If you don't like it, you're welcome to LEAVE! Don't let the door slap
your ass on the way out.
It's a public forum, dipshit! If you don't like it, e-mail witfal for a
personal answer.
Put that in your pipe and shove it. | 
02-23-2008, 02:30 AM
| | | Re: OT - No liberal bias? On 2008-02-22 17:08:44 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> said:
>> Sorry about the server stutter. And read that "same incident".
>>
>
>
> Server, or Chardonnay?
I had NOT, at that time, had my first glass of Cabernet. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 AM.
|