Discuss OT - No liberal bias? in the alt.autos.toyota forum at Car Dealer Forums; Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/ http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories for the ...

Go Back   Car Dealer Forums > OEM Info > Toyota > alt.autos.toyota

alt.autos.toyota alt.autos.toyota newsgroup

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 12:45 AM
witfal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT - No liberal bias?

Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories

for

the copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 12:45 AM
witfal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT - No liberal bias?

On 2008-02-22 16:37:05 -0800, witfal <nospam@all4.me> said:

> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories


for
the
>
> copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 12:45 AM
witfal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT - No liberal bias?

On 2008-02-22 16:37:40 -0800, witfal <nospam@all4.me> said:

> On 2008-02-22 16:37:05 -0800, witfal <nospam@all4.me> said:
>
>> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories


for
the

copy
>>
>> and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf


Sorry about the server stutter. And read that "same incident".

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 01:35 AM
JoeSpareBedroom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT - No liberal bias?


"witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
news:fpnpts$5v0$3@news.albasani.net...
> On 2008-02-22 16:37:40 -0800, witfal <nospam@all4.me> said:
>
>> On 2008-02-22 16:37:05 -0800, witfal <nospam@all4.me> said:
>>
>>> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>>>
>>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>>>
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>>>
>>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories

>
> for
> the
>
> copy
>>>
>>> and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf

>
> Sorry about the server stutter. And read that "same incident".
>



Server, or Chardonnay?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 01:35 AM
JoeSpareBedroom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT - No liberal bias?

"witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
news:fpnprh$5v0$1@news.albasani.net...
> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories
>
> for
> the copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf
>




Oh boy....

Even though it's obvious what you're thinking, please tell me in your own
words why you think one or more of the articles has a liberal bias.

*****BUT******

Pretend you're writing your response as an assignment for a journalism
class, in which you have been asked to analyze three similar articles. Your
professor is David Berkowitz aka "Son of Sam", sitting right behind you with
a .44 magnum tucked firmly into that notch at the back of your head where it
meets your neck.

Make it good.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 01:35 AM
Hachiroku ハチロク
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT - No liberal bias?

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:13:55 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
> news:fpnprh$5v0$1@news.albasani.net...
>> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories
>>
>> for
>> the copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf
>>
>>

>
>
> Oh boy....
>
> Even though it's obvious what you're thinking, please tell me in your own
> words why you think one or more of the articles has a liberal bias.



Hmmmm....perhaps a bit of "Political Correctness"?

I mean, we all know that illegal immigrants are so put upon society as it
is, and this would only raise more ire against them.

Not only that, but it is not correct to 'profile' someone this way.
Could lead to prejudice.

BTW, did the poor woman who hit the bus HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE?!?!?!
or INSURANCE?!?!?!



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 01:35 AM
JoeSpareBedroom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT - No liberal bias?

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
news:vxKvj.28$o23.10@trndny09...
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:13:55 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
>> "witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
>> news:fpnprh$5v0$1@news.albasani.net...
>>> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>>>
>>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>>>
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>>>
>>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories
>>>
>>> for
>>> the copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf
>>>
>>>

>>
>>
>> Oh boy....
>>
>> Even though it's obvious what you're thinking, please tell me in your own
>> words why you think one or more of the articles has a liberal bias.

>
>
> Hmmmm....perhaps a bit of "Political Correctness"?
>
> I mean, we all know that illegal immigrants are so put upon society as it
> is, and this would only raise more ire against them.
>
> Not only that, but it is not correct to 'profile' someone this way.
> Could lead to prejudice.
>
> BTW, did the poor woman who hit the bus HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE?!?!?!
> or INSURANCE?!?!?!



Who asked you? I asked witfal, who is capable of remaining focused on the
questions being asked. You are static.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 02:30 AM
Hachiroku ハチロク
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT - No liberal bias?

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:22:56 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
> news:vxKvj.28$o23.10@trndny09...
>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:13:55 +0000, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>
>>> "witfal" <nospam@all4.me> wrote in message
>>> news:fpnprh$5v0$1@news.albasani.net...
>>>> Right. Compare the two ways the sam incident was covered:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories
>>>>
>>>> for
>>>> the copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh boy....
>>>
>>> Even though it's obvious what you're thinking, please tell me in your
>>> own words why you think one or more of the articles has a liberal bias.

>>
>>
>> Hmmmm....perhaps a bit of "Political Correctness"?
>>
>> I mean, we all know that illegal immigrants are so put upon society as
>> it is, and this would only raise more ire against them.
>>
>> Not only that, but it is not correct to 'profile' someone this way.
>> Could lead to prejudice.
>>
>> BTW, did the poor woman who hit the bus HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE?!?!?! or
>> INSURANCE?!?!?!

>
>
> Who asked you? I asked witfal, who is capable of remaining focused on the
> questions being asked. You are static.



If you don't like it, you're welcome to LEAVE! Don't let the door slap
your ass on the way out.

It's a public forum, dipshit! If you don't like it, e-mail witfal for a
personal answer.

Put that in your pipe and shove it.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 02:30 AM
witfal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT - No liberal bias?

On 2008-02-22 17:08:44 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> said:
>> Sorry about the server stutter. And read that "same incident".
>>

>
>
> Server, or Chardonnay?


I had NOT, at that time, had my first glass of Cabernet.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 02:30 AM
witfal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT - No liberal bias?

On 2008-02-22 17:13:55 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> said:

>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331989,00.html
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23259097/
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/19/sch...rss_topstories


for
the
>>
>> copy and paste impaired: http://tinyurl.com/2gkltf
>>

>
>
>
> Oh boy....
>
> Even though it's obvious what you're thinking, please tell me in your own
> words why you think one or more of the articles has a liberal bias.


Simple. Withholding of the facts.

Make it good.

Good enough.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7