due to e-mails from one k00k.

IT's on Glenn Beck's web site.

Hachiroku ãƒ�ãƒ�ãƒ*ク wrote:
> due to e-mails from one k00k.
>
> IT's on Glenn Beck's web site.

I think this might be it?:
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/art...198/8412/?ck=1

A nice companion story (which I also posted about earlier today):
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...9-7583,00.html

Funny how no-one wants to discuss it, eh?

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

On Apr 7, 10:23 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...@ae86.gts> wrote:
> due to e-mails from one k00k.

Hachi, you've just made any possible relevant scientific points you
may have had

>
> IT's on Glenn Beck's web site.

irrelevant.

Glenn Beck is another self-referencing null pointer.

Learning Richard wrote:
> On Apr 7, 10:23 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...@ae86.gts> wrote:
>> due to e-mails from one k00k.
>
> Hachi, you've just made any possible relevant scientific points you
> may have had
>
>> IT's on Glenn Beck's web site.
>
> irrelevant.
>
> Glenn Beck is another self-referencing null pointer.

Far be it from you to let people make up their own minds. Like they are
going to say "Oh - OK - since someone said - ummm - whatever b.s.
expression you said - I guess I better not look at that.

Why are you afraid of the truth? For yourself as well as for others?
Oh - well - no problem. People are smarter than that. They know you're
still learning and in fact way down on the curve. You might try
adopting the philosophy of encouraging people to look at the information
and deciding for themselves instead of you acting like their priest.

Knowledge is power. Don't fear it.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

Bill Putney wrote:
> Hachiroku ãƒ�ãƒ�ãƒ*ク wrote:
>> due to e-mails from one k00k.
>> IT's on Glenn Beck's web site.
>
> I think this might be it?:
> http://www.glennbeck.com/content/art...198/8412/?ck=1
>
> A nice companion story (which I also posted about earlier today):
> http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...9-7583,00.html
>
> Funny how no-one wants to discuss it, eh?

Especially Learning Richard.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

Learning Richard wrote:

> ...Glenn Beck is another self-referencing null pointer.

You mean there's more than one of you?

Actually Glenn is fun to listen to, as well as informative. Besides his
radio show at various times around the country on different stations,
he's on CNN Headline News for an hour each weekday evening at 7 and then
again at 9. He's also on XM 165 9-noon ET. How's that for SPAM,
Richard? Thanks for the opportunity to introduce people to Glenn Beck.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
> due to e-mails from one k00k.
>
> IT's on Glenn Beck's web site.

What kind of scientist is Glen Beck?

Bill Putney wrote:

> Actually Glenn is fun to listen to, as well as informative.

Prove it. I knew you couldn't.

Glen Beck is at least as learned as Al Gore. And, Beck has a job!!
Ron


<manny@london.com> wrote in message
news:e31ccb4e-4692-4528-851b-855c9546ad51@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>> due to e-mails from one k00k.
>>
>> IT's on Glenn Beck's web site.
>
> What kind of scientist is Glen Beck?
>

On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:06:47 -0700, manny wrote:

>
>
> Hachiroku ãƒ�ãƒ�ãƒ*ク wrote:
>> due to e-mails from one k00k.
>>
>> IT's on Glenn Beck's web site.
>
> What kind of scientist is Glen Beck?

DUH! He's not.

But I listen to the BBC all the time and hearing they were swayed by one
k00k (who, BTW is also NOT a 'scientist') doesn't surprise me.

And, since you seem to have your head in the sand, it was released
Thursday on more outlets than the BBC that the temperature has settled
over the past 10 years, and meteorologists are predicting a decline for
this year. I've seen it in papers, heard it on the radio from more than
just Glenn Beck, and have seen it 'mentioned' on TV from various sources.

The BBC seems to have this agenda of getting in your face to make YOU
think YOU are responsible for 'Climate Change', especially if you listen
to any reports from Matt McGraw, their 'Science Correspondent', who has
unequivocally pointed out that Climate Change is caused by Man, ignoring
any climatic studies that have shown it occurs every 10-15,000 years.

The point of the post was that ONE person got the BBC to change a storey
because she didn't agree with it. Did you even bother to look at the link?