http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...9-7583,00.html

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

On Apr 8, 6:42 pm, Bill the Pud <b...@kinez.net> wrote:
> http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...9-7583,00.html
>
> Bill the Pud

Hey dufus

> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
> address with the letter 'x')

Right. All that effort to email you (as IF) and all we get from you
are spam URL posts. Come on Pud, can't write a brief synopsis?
You're no better than the "buy a watch" spammers infesting this group.

Learning Richard wrote:
> On Apr 8, 6:42 pm, Bill the Pud <b...@kinez.net> wrote:
>> http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...9-7583,00.html
>>
>> Bill the Pud
>
> Hey dufus
>
>> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
>> address with the letter 'x')
>
> Right. All that effort to email you (as IF) and all we get from you
> are spam URL posts. Come on Pud, can't write a brief synopsis?
> You're no better than the "buy a watch" spammers infesting this group.

A lame tactic right out of the liberal playbook. Do you ever speak the
truth? (hint: no)

But - yeah - it talks about how the global warmers are having to scrap
all their models because nothing in the real world is adding up,
including the latest satellite data. But all they will do is come up
with more obfuscation to cloud the whole issue again for the
unintelligent such as yourself to accept and Al Gore to capitalize on.

"The head of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has
actually acknowledged it. He talks about the apparent plateau in
temperatures so far this century. So he recognises that in this century,
over the past eight years, temperatures have plateaued ... This is not
what you'd expect, as I said, because if carbon dioxide is driving
temperature then you'd expect that, given carbon dioxide levels have
been continuing to increase, temperatures should be going up ... So
(it's) very unexpected, not something that's being discussed. It should
be being discussed, though, because it's very significant."

"That's right ... These findings actually aren't being disputed by the
meteorological community. They're having trouble digesting the findings,
they're acknowledging the findings, they're acknowledging that the data
from NASA's Aqua satellite is not how the models predict, and I think
they're about to recognise that the models really do need to be
overhauled and that when they are overhauled they will probably show
greatly reduced future warming projected as a consequence of carbon
dioxide."

There - just a couple of paragraphs since you're so lazy. I'm sure
you'll find it interesting. (sarcasm - since I know facts are of no
interest to you - you are only interested in discrediting the messenger
- liberal playbook again)

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

Global warming doesn't matter, Bill. Last week, everyone on earth agreed
that less emissions are a good thing simply because it means cleaner air to
breathe.

You must've been busy when everyone agreed. Maybe you were at the dentist or
something.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> Global warming doesn't matter, Bill. Last week, everyone on earth agreed
> that less emissions are a good thing simply because it means cleaner air to
> breathe.
>
> You must've been busy when everyone agreed. Maybe you were at the dentist or
> something.

You mean - all the b.s. global warming pseudo-science crap is going to
stop? I guess Al Gore better start up a company to process flourescent
light bulbs - after being forced to buy them, people will be charged for
his disposing of them. And while he's at it, he can start flying around
the world in his personal jet with his hair on fire to warn everyone
about the impending ice age.

I like clean air. I just don't like idiots mixing false science in with
legitimate concerns so the situation can be manipulated for personal
gain and impeding true progress (like fake claims about polar bears and
how my cutting my grass has to stop because it endangers them).

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

"Bill Putney" <bptn@kinez.net> wrote in message
news:662kf0F2i5odiU1@mid.individual.net...
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>> Global warming doesn't matter, Bill. Last week, everyone on earth agreed
>> that less emissions are a good thing simply because it means cleaner air
>> to breathe.
>>
>> You must've been busy when everyone agreed. Maybe you were at the dentist
>> or something.
>
> You mean - all the b.s. global warming pseudo-science crap is going to
> stop? I guess Al Gore better start up a company to process flourescent
> light bulbs - after being forced to buy them, people will be charged for
> his disposing of them. And while he's at it, he can start flying around
> the world in his personal jet with his hair on fire to warn everyone about
> the impending ice age.
>
> I like clean air. I just don't like idiots mixing false science in with
> legitimate concerns so the situation can be manipulated for personal gain
> and impeding true progress (like fake claims about polar bears and how my
> cutting my grass has to stop because it endangers them).
>
> Bill Putney


The global warming interest will never go away. It shouldn't go away, and it
doesn't matter to you in any real sense. You don't like the issue because to
you, it's political. You don't like Gore. If your wife was doing the
research and the results were always contradicting each other, you'd defend
her against any and all criticism.

You know I'm right.

On Apr 8, 8:58 pm, Bill Putney <b...@kinex.net> wrote:
> Learning Richard wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 6:42 pm, Bill the Pud <b...@kiney.net> wrote:

Hey DUFUS, kinez.net has been getting spammed since at least Aug 24,
2006 thanks to you! Good job!


> >> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
> >> address with the letter 'x')
>
> > Right. All that effort to email you (as IF) and all we get from you
> > are spam URL posts. Come on Pud, can't write a brief synopsis?
> > You're no better than the "buy a watch" spammers infesting this
> > group.
>
> A lame tactic right out of the liberal playbook. Do you ever speak the
> truth? (hint: no)

What's the answer?

Oh yeah break your damned paragraphs up.

>
> But - yeah - it talks about how the global warmers

"the global warmers"? where do you get a "global warmer"? Something
imported from China perhaps?

I get it... "global warmer -- the warmer that heats the buns you eat
or the buns you sit on!" The OXY-CLEAN guy could sell 'em.

> are having to scrap
> all their models because nothing in the real world is adding up,

If I give you two apples, then I take away two more apples, how many
apples do you have?

> including the latest satellite data.

Such as?

> But all they will do is come up
> with more obfuscation

> to cloud the whole issue again
> for the unintelligent such as yourself

Hey bubba, now's your chance to edummukate me.

What is a quantifiable (not anecdotal) example of how Mainstream
Science (if you will) has attempted to obfuscate a central fact of
Global Warming?


> to accept and Al Gore to capitalize on.

You have something against getting rich? What are you, a commie?

>
> "The head of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has
> actually acknowledged it. He talks about the apparent plateau in
> temperatures so far this century. So he recognises that in this century,
> over the past eight years, temperatures have plateaued ...

what exactly does that imply? What sort of stabilization do you
desire? I recall a time when I had a filthy clogged up radiator in my
1977 Toyota Corolla.

I ran that car at a stabilized (temporary plateau) temp just a few
notches under the red. For about a week. Then of course the lower
radiator hose blew and I put in a new radiator and swapped all of the
hoses.

> This is not
> what you'd expect, as I said, because if carbon dioxide is driving
> temperature then you'd expect that, given carbon dioxide levels have
> been continuing to increase, temperatures should be going up ...

it's really that simple, eh?

> So
> (it's) very unexpected, not something that's being discussed. It should
> be being discussed, though, because it's very significant."

not with global warmers, they're imported from China and people have
been warming their asses with them, or so I hear

Besides, what if you're wrong? Because if you _are_ wrong, and
society chooses not to change / become prepared, we're screwed.

If you're right, we'd still at least find a way to stop buying oil
from terrorists in the process of becoming prepared.

Lets get honest, the Middle East is a much more presenting threat than
global warming right now at least. I'm almost outta bread, brotha.

>
> < swoosh />

Learning Richard wrote:
> On Apr 8, 8:58 pm, Bill Putney <b...@kinex.net> wrote:
>> Learning Richard wrote:
>>> On Apr 8, 6:42 pm, Bill the Pud <b...@kiney.net> wrote:
>
> Hey DUFUS, kinez.net has been getting spammed since at least Aug 24,
> 2006 thanks to you! Good job!

What do I care. There is no such thing. Besides that, you are a
spammer? Not surprised. Sick mind.

>> including the latest satellite data.
>
> Such as?

I give you the information you need and you ignore it. Can't help you.
Lead a horse to water . . . can't make him drink. You are a great
example of intentional ignorance. Bye.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> ...You don't like Gore. If your wife was doing the
> research and the results were always contradicting each other, you'd defend
> her against any and all criticism.
>
> You know I'm right.

Well, except it's a strawman argument. I wouldn't marry a person so
dishonest, so the problem wouldn't occur. Hard for liberals to
understand I know. Don't think about it too hard. You either get it or
you don't.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

"Bill Putney" <bptn@kinez.net> wrote in message
news:662mneF2i7nlsU1@mid.individual.net...
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
>> ...You don't like Gore. If your wife was doing the research and the
>> results were always contradicting each other, you'd defend her against
>> any and all criticism.
>>
>> You know I'm right.
>
> Well, except it's a strawman argument. I wouldn't marry a person so
> dishonest, so the problem wouldn't occur. Hard for liberals to understand
> I know. Don't think about it too hard. You either get it or you don't.
>
> Bill Putney


How do you know global warming research is dishonest? I'm taking some time
off today, so I'll have plenty of free time to read your evidence. No links.
Your words ONLY.