A survey of 3,400 active and retired high-level officers give their
opinions on the U.S. military on several subjects, including the war,
torture, manpower needs, and the next war:

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...d=4198&print=1

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT), beerspill@whoever.com wrote:

>A survey of 3,400 active and retired high-level officers give their
>opinions on the U.S. military on several subjects, including the war,
>torture, manpower needs, and the next war:
>
>http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...d=4198&print=1

foreign policy.com?

That would not be a left leaning organization, would it.....

gawd you libs are out to lunch........

--

Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <MoveOn@outa.here> wrote in message
news:eh8vv3lolfsm27g4tp0j3as5hq3rfu4n9o@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT), beerspill@whoever.com wrote:
>
>>A survey of 3,400 active and retired high-level officers give their
>>opinions on the U.S. military on several subjects, including the war,
>>torture, manpower needs, and the next war:
>>
>>http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...d=4198&print=1
>
> foreign policy.com?
>
> That would not be a left leaning organization, would it.....
>
> gawd you libs are out to lunch........
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida


We had this discussion once before. Someone told you to believe that all our
soldiers think everything's just peachy, the war's a great idea, and humans
cease to make mistakes once they are elected to public office.

Whoever told you that was wrong.

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:39:56 -0400, Scott in Florida
<MoveOn@outa.here> wrote:

>On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT), beerspill@whoever.com wrote:
>
>>A survey of 3,400 active and retired high-level officers give their
>>opinions on the U.S. military on several subjects, including the war,
>>torture, manpower needs, and the next war:
>>
>>http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...d=4198&print=1
>
>foreign policy.com?
>
>That would not be a left leaning organization, would it.....
>
>gawd you libs are out to lunch........

From the article....

Participants in the survey were selected by the Center for a New
American Security and Foreign Policy. The nonscientific survey was
administered online from December 7, 2007, to January 15, 2008. For
more information or a further breakdown of the results, please contact
info@cnas.org.


NONSCIENTIFIC SURVEY .... ONLINE

What crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

--

Scott in Florida

Scott in Florida wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT), beerspill@whoever.com wrote:
>
> >A survey of 3,400 active and retired high-level officers give their
> >opinions on the U.S. military on several subjects, including the war,
> >torture, manpower needs, and the next war:
> >
> >http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...d=4198&print=1
>
> foreign policy.com?
>
> That would not be a left leaning organization, would it.....
>
> gawd you libs are out to lunch........

"FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace."

Sounds like an academic journal, not the wacking material you normally
enjoy (Dog Fancy and Cat Fancy magazines).

"MaceFace" <maceface@nycmail.com> wrote in message
news:c423ff20-b32a-4339-a49d-d8d6a0677e03@k10g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Scott in Florida wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT), beerspill@whoever.com wrote:
>>
>> >A survey of 3,400 active and retired high-level officers give their
>> >opinions on the U.S. military on several subjects, including the war,
>> >torture, manpower needs, and the next war:
>> >
>> >http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...d=4198&print=1
>>
>> foreign policy.com?
>>
>> That would not be a left leaning organization, would it.....
>>
>> gawd you libs are out to lunch........
>
> "FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Carnegie Endowment for
> International Peace."
>
> Sounds like an academic journal, not the wacking material you normally
> enjoy (Dog Fancy and Cat Fancy magazines).
>
Not so. Scott reads "Soldier of Fortune" to see what he's missed by being
in the Navy.

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:48:19 -0700, "mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com>
wrote:

>
>"MaceFace" <maceface@nycmail.com> wrote in message
>news:c423ff20-b32a-4339-a49d-d8d6a0677e03@k10g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>> Scott in Florida wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT), beerspill@whoever.com wrote:
>>>
>>> >A survey of 3,400 active and retired high-level officers give their
>>> >opinions on the U.S. military on several subjects, including the war,
>>> >torture, manpower needs, and the next war:
>>> >
>>> >http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...d=4198&print=1
>>>
>>> foreign policy.com?
>>>
>>> That would not be a left leaning organization, would it.....
>>>
>>> gawd you libs are out to lunch........
>>
>> "FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Carnegie Endowment for
>> International Peace."
>>
>> Sounds like an academic journal, not the wacking material you normally
>> enjoy (Dog Fancy and Cat Fancy magazines).
>>
>Not so. Scott reads "Soldier of Fortune" to see what he's missed by being
>in the Navy.
>

The latest Medal of Honor winner was a NAVY Seal....

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/09/wa...al.html?ref=us

--

Scott in Florida

In article
<7619061c-e736-48a0-b255-7b7dcf97598b@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
beerspill@whoever.com wrote:

> A survey of 3,400 active and retired high-level officers give their
> opinions on the U.S. military on several subjects, including the war,
> torture, manpower needs, and the next war:
>
> http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...d=4198&print=1

More garbage from the left. Go chop some freaking wood will ya.
--



"It depends on how you define aloneŠ"

*Bill Clinton

"dbu" <nospam@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-553CB9.18514011042008@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article
> <7619061c-e736-48a0-b255-7b7dcf97598b@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
> beerspill@whoever.com wrote:
>
>> A survey of 3,400 active and retired high-level officers give their
>> opinions on the U.S. military on several subjects, including the war,
>> torture, manpower needs, and the next war:
>>
>> http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...d=4198&print=1
>
> More garbage from the left. Go chop some freaking wood will ya.


You're correct. Soldiers have no opinions. They have no thoughts. They
accept whatever they're told.

You hate our soldiers. Why?

In article <rCTLj.1493$NU2.184@news01.roc.ny>,
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "dbu" <nospam@nospam.moc> wrote in message
> news:nospam-553CB9.18514011042008@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article
> > <7619061c-e736-48a0-b255-7b7dcf97598b@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
> > beerspill@whoever.com wrote:
> >
> >> A survey of 3,400 active and retired high-level officers give their
> >> opinions on the U.S. military on several subjects, including the war,
> >> torture, manpower needs, and the next war:
> >>
> >> http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...d=4198&print=1
> >
> > More garbage from the left. Go chop some freaking wood will ya.
>
>
> You're correct. Soldiers have no opinions. They have no thoughts. They
> accept whatever they're told.
>
> You hate our soldiers. Why?

The report is garbage. Even if it had credence it still does not
reflect the entire military. There are always a few who don't have
enough to do so they complain. The old saying is always true, busy
troops are happy troops.
--



"It depends on how you define aloneŠ"

*Bill Clinton