A Judge with some common sense!!!

Brittney was suing US Weekly for running a story that her and her husband
have made an explicit sex tape:



"The article is libelous on its face, since it maliciously and recklessly
portrays (Spears) as acting 'goofy' while watching" the video with their
attorneys, the suit said.

The judge disagreed.

"It is clear that plaintiff did not bring this lawsuit because she was falsely
accused of acting goofy," Hart Cole wrote. "The issue is whether it is
defamatory to state that a husband and wife taped themselves engaging in
consensual sex."

The judge went on to conclude that Spears has "put her modern sexuality squarely,
and profitably, before the public eye" in a way that would make it
unlikely for the magazine article to be found defamatory.

________________

I love it. She flaunts herself in front of the cameras (and kids) wearing
near nothing, has said absolutely STUPID things in public, and then
accuses someone ELSE of making her look like a tart?!?!

Thank God there are SOME smart judges out there!

"Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
news:P6l4h.7002$MO6.401@trndny06...
>A Judge with some common sense!!!
>
> Brittney was suing US Weekly for running a story that her and her husband
> have made an explicit sex tape:
>
>
>
> "The article is libelous on its face, since it maliciously and recklessly
> portrays (Spears) as acting 'goofy' while watching" the video with their
> attorneys, the suit said.
>
> The judge disagreed.
>
> "It is clear that plaintiff did not bring this lawsuit because she was
> falsely
> accused of acting goofy," Hart Cole wrote. "The issue is whether it is
> defamatory to state that a husband and wife taped themselves engaging in
> consensual sex."
>
> The judge went on to conclude that Spears has "put her modern sexuality
> squarely,
> and profitably, before the public eye" in a way that would make it
> unlikely for the magazine article to be found defamatory.
>
> ________________
>
> I love it. She flaunts herself in front of the cameras (and kids) wearing
> near nothing, has said absolutely STUPID things in public, and then
> accuses someone ELSE of making her look like a tart?!?!
>
> Thank God there are SOME smart judges out there!
>
>

Yeah, that's like Madonna saying her honor has been defamed.

Smartest thing Twitney ever did was finally dump that worthless gold-digging
'husband' of hers.

Natalie

On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:06:30 -0500, Wickeddoll® wrote:

>
> "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
> news:P6l4h.7002$MO6.401@trndny06...
>>A Judge with some common sense!!!
>>
>> Brittney was suing US Weekly for running a story that her and her husband
>> have made an explicit sex tape:
>>
>>
>>
>> "The article is libelous on its face, since it maliciously and recklessly
>> portrays (Spears) as acting 'goofy' while watching" the video with their
>> attorneys, the suit said.
>>
>> The judge disagreed.
>>
>> "It is clear that plaintiff did not bring this lawsuit because she was
>> falsely
>> accused of acting goofy," Hart Cole wrote. "The issue is whether it is
>> defamatory to state that a husband and wife taped themselves engaging in
>> consensual sex."
>>
>> The judge went on to conclude that Spears has "put her modern sexuality
>> squarely,
>> and profitably, before the public eye" in a way that would make it
>> unlikely for the magazine article to be found defamatory.
>>
>> ________________
>>
>> I love it. She flaunts herself in front of the cameras (and kids) wearing
>> near nothing, has said absolutely STUPID things in public, and then
>> accuses someone ELSE of making her look like a tart?!?!
>>
>> Thank God there are SOME smart judges out there!
>>
>>
>
> Yeah, that's like Madonna saying her honor has been defamed.
>
> Smartest thing Twitney ever did was finally dump that worthless gold-digging
> 'husband' of hers.
>
> Natalie


I always liked the reference "Pop-Tart" myself!

ANd she dumped him with a text msg!

"Hachiroku" <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in message
news:wZQ4h.11195$bg7.9770@trndny04...
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:06:30 -0500, Wickeddoll® wrote:
>
>>
>> "Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
>> news:P6l4h.7002$MO6.401@trndny06...
>>>A Judge with some common sense!!!
>>>
>>> Brittney was suing US Weekly for running a story that her and her
>>> husband
>>> have made an explicit sex tape:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "The article is libelous on its face, since it maliciously and
>>> recklessly
>>> portrays (Spears) as acting 'goofy' while watching" the video with their
>>> attorneys, the suit said.
>>>
>>> The judge disagreed.
>>>
>>> "It is clear that plaintiff did not bring this lawsuit because she was
>>> falsely
>>> accused of acting goofy," Hart Cole wrote. "The issue is whether it is
>>> defamatory to state that a husband and wife taped themselves engaging in
>>> consensual sex."
>>>
>>> The judge went on to conclude that Spears has "put her modern sexuality
>>> squarely,
>>> and profitably, before the public eye" in a way that would make it
>>> unlikely for the magazine article to be found defamatory.
>>>
>>> ________________
>>>
>>> I love it. She flaunts herself in front of the cameras (and kids)
>>> wearing
>>> near nothing, has said absolutely STUPID things in public, and then
>>> accuses someone ELSE of making her look like a tart?!?!
>>>
>>> Thank God there are SOME smart judges out there!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, that's like Madonna saying her honor has been defamed.
>>
>> Smartest thing Twitney ever did was finally dump that worthless
>> gold-digging
>> 'husband' of hers.
>>
>> Natalie
>
>
> I always liked the reference "Pop-Tart" myself!
>
> ANd she dumped him with a text msg!
>
>

The scumbag 'K-Fed' has been renamed "FedEx" on the net. ROFL

Natalie