OT: Top General warns against cut and running

#1 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 01:06 AM

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15731613/
--

#2 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 01:06 AM

"dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
news:repubs-3BD8B1.13570615112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15731613/
> --
>

HA, you think that dims will want to listen to any general if it goes
against their agenda? Hell no they wouldn't. All advice is acceptable so
long as it fits their agenda.

#3 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 01:06 AM

On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:14:00 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>"dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>news:repubs-3BD8B1.13570615112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15731613/
>> --
>>
>
>
>HA, you think that dims will want to listen to any general if it goes
>against their agenda? Hell no they wouldn't. All advice is acceptable so
>long as it fits their agenda.
>

You must be talking about dim George W Bush. That fits him to a T.

#4 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 01:06 AM

"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:NyK6h.30271$E_2.27921@newsfe18.lga...
>
> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> news:repubs-3BD8B1.13570615112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15731613/
>> --
>>
>
>
> HA, you think that dims will want to listen to any general if it goes
> against their agenda? Hell no they wouldn't. All advice is acceptable so
> long as it fits their agenda.

Gee, now why does this remind me of a certain someone & his administration?

Cathy

>
>

#5 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 01:06 AM

"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:NyK6h.30271$E_2.27921@newsfe18.lga...
>
> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> news:repubs-3BD8B1.13570615112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15731613/
>> --
>>
>
>
> HA, you think that dims will want to listen to any general if it goes
> against their agenda? Hell no they wouldn't. All advice is acceptable so
> long as it fits their agenda.
>

You type that with a straight face?? lol

#6 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 01:06 AM

"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:NyK6h.30271$E_2.27921@newsfe18.lga...
>
> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> news:repubs-3BD8B1.13570615112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15731613/
>> --
>>
>
>
> HA, you think that dims will want to listen to any general if it goes
> against their agenda? Hell no they wouldn't. All advice is acceptable so
> long as it fits their agenda.
>

What the general is saying is that an orderly withdrawal is in order. But,
you prefer to hear "cut & run" because it only involves two words and an
abbreviation.

#7 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 01:06 AM

Actually, it's called a logogram - there's your word for today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampersand

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:NyK6h.30271$E_2.27921@newsfe18.lga...
> >
> > "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> > news:repubs-3BD8B1.13570615112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15731613/
> >> --
> >>
> >
> >
> > HA, you think that dims will want to listen to any general if it goes
> > against their agenda? Hell no they wouldn't. All advice is acceptable so
> > long as it fits their agenda.
> >
>
>
> What the general is saying is that an orderly withdrawal is in order. But,
> you prefer to hear "cut & run" because it only involves two words and an
> abbreviation.

#8 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 01:06 AM

"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:itL6h.5488$Ka1.5388@news01.roc.ny...
> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:NyK6h.30271$E_2.27921@newsfe18.lga...
>>
>> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>> news:repubs-3BD8B1.13570615112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15731613/
>>> --
>>>
>>
>>
>> HA, you think that dims will want to listen to any general if it goes
>> against their agenda? Hell no they wouldn't. All advice is acceptable so
>> long as it fits their agenda.
>>
>
>
> What the general is saying is that an orderly withdrawal is in order. But,
> you prefer to hear "cut & run" because it only involves two words and an
> abbreviation.
>

As many here already know, I'm not at all a fan of Bush and his
administration. For some reason though, it seems that the liberals here like
to imply such when I post anything negative about their ever faithful fellow
demoncraps. What I find really ironic about this is that many times they
continue to be unable to defend the original accusation against them. I
think that they call that guilt displacement in sociology.Cute, but rather
childish.

#9 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 01:06 AM

Weak americans taking shots at a President of the other party while at war.

"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ToN6h.11$mP4.3@newsfe23.lga...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:itL6h.5488$Ka1.5388@news01.roc.ny...
>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:NyK6h.30271$E_2.27921@newsfe18.lga...
>>>
>>> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>>> news:repubs-3BD8B1.13570615112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15731613/
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> HA, you think that dims will want to listen to any general if it goes
>>> against their agenda? Hell no they wouldn't. All advice is acceptable so
>>> long as it fits their agenda.
>>>
>>
>>
>> What the general is saying is that an orderly withdrawal is in order.
>> But, you prefer to hear "cut & run" because it only involves two words
>> and an abbreviation.
>>
>
> As many here already know, I'm not at all a fan of Bush and his
> administration. For some reason though, it seems that the liberals here
> like to imply such when I post anything negative about their ever faithful
> fellow demoncraps. What I find really ironic about this is that many times
> they continue to be unable to defend the original accusation against them.
> I think that they call that guilt displacement in sociology.Cute, but
> rather childish.
>

#10 (**permalink**) 11-16-2006, 10:40 PM

Thank you.

"Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1163628963.180082.229510@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
> Actually, it's called a logogram - there's your word for today.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampersand
>
>
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>> "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:NyK6h.30271$E_2.27921@newsfe18.lga...
>> >
>> > "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>> > news:repubs-3BD8B1.13570615112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> >> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15731613/
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > HA, you think that dims will want to listen to any general if it goes
>> > against their agenda? Hell no they wouldn't. All advice is acceptable
>> > so
>> > long as it fits their agenda.
>> >
>>
>>
>> What the general is saying is that an orderly withdrawal is in order.
>> But,
>> you prefer to hear "cut & run" because it only involves two words and an
>> abbreviation.
>