might surprise ya - surprised me!

http://tinyurl.com/56t7k3

Natalie

--
http://www.wegrokspock.net

i agree with the top ten list of highest resale value vehicles, though it may be pricey it sure is great!

__________________
my Autopartswarehouse blog

On Aug 7, 7:58*pm, "Wickeddoll®"
<wickeddollnofeckingspam1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> might surprise ya - surprised me!
>
> http://tinyurl.com/56t7k3
>
> Natalie
>
> --http://www.wegrokspock.net

But, the problem with this is these are the *expected* resale values
of the vehicles 2 or 3 years from now and they are as a percentage of
the actual price of the vehicle. So if a Lincoln Navigator is already
steeply discounted, well, the discounted price is actually used and
not the list price.

The numbers appear to be used to determine the price of leases, not as
actual prices.

"Jeff"
"Wickeddoll®"
wrote:
> might surprise ya - surprised me!
>
> http://tinyurl.com/56t7k3
>
> Natalie
>
> --http://www.wegrokspock.net

But, the problem with this is these are the *expected* resale values
of the vehicles 2 or 3 years from now and they are as a percentage of
the actual price of the vehicle. So if a Lincoln Navigator is already
steeply discounted, well, the discounted price is actually used and
not the list price.

The numbers appear to be used to determine the price of leases, not as
actual prices.

Jeff

Still surprising to see so many huge vehicles on that list.

Natalie

"Jeff" <jeff.utz@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e9a6204-4298-49ed-8e1c-a15acaca5faf@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 7, 7:58 pm, "Wickeddoll®"
<wickeddollnofeckingspam1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> might surprise ya - surprised me!
>
> http://tinyurl.com/56t7k3
>
> Natalie
>
> --http://www.wegrokspock.net

But, the problem with this is these are the *expected* resale values
of the vehicles 2 or 3 years from now and they are as a percentage of
the actual price of the vehicle. So if a Lincoln Navigator is already
steeply discounted, well, the discounted price is actually used and
not the list price.

The numbers appear to be used to determine the price of leases, not as
actual prices.

****************
The Featured Vehicles to the right of the story are not the vehicles with
the highest residual value, i.e., Navigator, Explorer, etc.

You have to watch the slide show to see the vehicles with the highest
residual value.
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

"Ray O"...
>
> "Jeff"
"Wickeddoll®"
wrote:
>> might surprise ya - surprised me!
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/56t7k3
>>
>> Natalie
>>
>> --http://www.wegrokspock.net
>
> But, the problem with this is these are the *expected* resale values
> of the vehicles 2 or 3 years from now and they are as a percentage of
> the actual price of the vehicle. So if a Lincoln Navigator is already
> steeply discounted, well, the discounted price is actually used and
> not the list price.
>
> The numbers appear to be used to determine the price of leases, not as
> actual prices.
>
> ****************
> The Featured Vehicles to the right of the story are not the vehicles with
> the highest residual value, i.e., Navigator, Explorer, etc.
>
> You have to watch the slide show to see the vehicles with the highest
> residual value.
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>
yeah, someone else said that - gotta love semantics, huh?

Natalie

"Wickeddoll®" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1958@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:g7fvq9.1k4.1@news.evilcabal.org...
<snipped>
> yeah, someone else said that - gotta love semantics, huh?
>
> Natalie

It's either love semantics or be labeled as anti-semantic ;-)
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

"Ray O"...
> "Jeff"...
> "Wickeddoll®"...
>> might surprise ya - surprised me!
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/56t7k3
>>
>> Natalie
>>
>> --http://www.wegrokspock.net
>
> But, the problem with this is these are the *expected* resale values
> of the vehicles 2 or 3 years from now and they are as a percentage of
> the actual price of the vehicle. So if a Lincoln Navigator is already
> steeply discounted, well, the discounted price is actually used and
> not the list price.
>
> The numbers appear to be used to determine the price of leases, not as
> actual prices.
>
> ****************
> The Featured Vehicles to the right of the story are not the vehicles with
> the highest residual value, i.e., Navigator, Explorer, etc.
>
> You have to watch the slide show to see the vehicles with the highest
> residual value.

Interesting that with current resale numbers often exceeding retail new car
numbers that the Prius is not on this list.
Tomes

"Tomes" <ask.me@here.net> wrote in message
news:g7gjc4$g27$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> "Ray O"...
>> "Jeff"...
>> "Wickeddoll®"...
>>> might surprise ya - surprised me!
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/56t7k3
>>>
>>> Natalie
>>>
>>> --http://www.wegrokspock.net
>>
>> But, the problem with this is these are the *expected* resale values
>> of the vehicles 2 or 3 years from now and they are as a percentage of
>> the actual price of the vehicle. So if a Lincoln Navigator is already
>> steeply discounted, well, the discounted price is actually used and
>> not the list price.
>>
>> The numbers appear to be used to determine the price of leases, not as
>> actual prices.
>>
>> ****************
>> The Featured Vehicles to the right of the story are not the vehicles with
>> the highest residual value, i.e., Navigator, Explorer, etc.
>>
>> You have to watch the slide show to see the vehicles with the highest
>> residual value.
>
> Interesting that with current resale numbers often exceeding retail new
> car numbers that the Prius is not on this list.
> Tomes

I was wondering about that myself. The phenomenon where a used 2008 Prius
is worth more than a new one is a relatively recent development. The
article I read said that since dealers did not have new ones on the lot,
they were contacting customers who bought a Prius within the last year and
offering to buy them back for what they paid, in essence giving the owners
the use of the vehicles for the cost of money. I'm thinking that the
newness of the phenomenon means that it isn't reflected in residual values
yet.
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

"Tomes" <ask.me@here.net> wrote in message
news:g7gjc4$g27$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> "Ray O"...
>> "Jeff"...
>> "Wickeddoll®"...
>>> might surprise ya - surprised me!
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/56t7k3
>>>
>>> Natalie
>>>
>>> --http://www.wegrokspock.net
>>
>> But, the problem with this is these are the *expected* resale values
>> of the vehicles 2 or 3 years from now and they are as a percentage of
>> the actual price of the vehicle. So if a Lincoln Navigator is already
>> steeply discounted, well, the discounted price is actually used and
>> not the list price.
>>
>> The numbers appear to be used to determine the price of leases, not as
>> actual prices.
>>
>> ****************
>> The Featured Vehicles to the right of the story are not the vehicles with
>> the highest residual value, i.e., Navigator, Explorer, etc.
>>
>> You have to watch the slide show to see the vehicles with the highest
>> residual value.
>
> Interesting that with current resale numbers often exceeding retail new
> car numbers that the Prius is not on this list.

I was wondering about that, too.

Cathy


> Tomes