edspyhill01@yahoo.com wrote:

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jekKNdZaeTY&NR=1


You wish he was the candidate, don't you?

badgolferman wrote:
> edspyhill01@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jekKNdZaeTY&NR=1
>
>
> You wish he was the candidate, don't you?

We use 25% of world oil but we have just 3% of the reserves.

Those numbers are meaningless unless you believe that we use are going
to use the world's entire reserve in the next year. Of course trying
to reason with a foaming-at-the-mouth Dim is equally meaningless...

http://www.runet.edu/~wkovarik/oil/



On Aug 28, 4:11*pm, "edspyhil...@yahoo.com" <edspyhil...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> badgolferman wrote:
> > edspyhil...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jekKNdZaeTY&NR=1
>
> > You wish he was the candidate, don't you?
>
> We use 25% of world oil but we have just 3% of the reserves.

Mark wrote:
> Those numbers are meaningless unless you believe that we use are going
> to use the world's entire reserve in the next year. Of course trying
> to reason with a foaming-at-the-mouth Dim is equally meaningless...
>
> http://www.runet.edu/~wkovarik/oil/
>
>
>
> On Aug 28, 4:11�pm, "edspyhil...@yahoo.com" <edspyhil...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > badgolferman wrote:
> > > edspyhil...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jekKNdZaeTY&NR=1
> >
> > > You wish he was the candidate, don't you?
> >
> > We use 25% of world oil but we have just 3% of the reserves.

BUT, there seems to be a strange urgency to give something to oil
companies before Dubya leaves office. Sort of smells. Sounds like a
Used Car salesman putting pressure on us.

Try thinking about what you read, it might dawn on you as to why we are
shoveling 700 billion dollars a year overseas for oil, a transfer rate that
likely is unsustainable even for us.
"Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f6480878-00ac-40ad-80e3-d43db490e68c@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
Those numbers are meaningless unless you believe that we use are going
to use the world's entire reserve in the next year. Of course trying
to reason with a foaming-at-the-mouth Dim is equally meaningless...

http://www.runet.edu/~wkovarik/oil/



On Aug 28, 4:11 pm, "edspyhil...@yahoo.com" <edspyhil...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> badgolferman wrote:
> > edspyhil...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jekKNdZaeTY&NR=1
>
> > You wish he was the candidate, don't you?
>
> We use 25% of world oil but we have just 3% of the reserves.

In article
<3eb0c095-ac3e-4b62-a4b9-4eb4fb09af10@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
"edspyhill01@yahoo.com" <edspyhill01@yahoo.com> wrote:

> badgolferman wrote:
> > edspyhill01@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jekKNdZaeTY&NR=1
> >
> >
> > You wish he was the candidate, don't you?
>
> We use 25% of world oil but we have just 3% of the reserves.

Run that by me again, in a little more detail. Something is missing.
--

On Aug 28, 5:30*pm, dbu <nos...@nospam.moc> wrote:
> In article
> <3eb0c095-ac3e-4b62-a4b9-4eb4fb09a...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>
> *"edspyhil...@yahoo.com" <edspyhil...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > badgolferman wrote:
> > > edspyhil...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jekKNdZaeTY&NR=1
>
> > > You wish he was the candidate, don't you?
>
> > We use 25% of world oil but we have just 3% of the reserves.
>
> Run that by me again, in a little more detail. *Something is missing.
> --

It means that even if we exploited every barrel of oil under North
American land we'd be 22% short and have to import that amount of oil.

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:11:06 -0700 (PDT), "edspyhill01@yahoo.com"
<edspyhill01@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>badgolferman wrote:
>> edspyhill01@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jekKNdZaeTY&NR=1
>>
>>
>> You wish he was the candidate, don't you?
>
>We use 25% of world oil but we have just 3% of the reserves.

ROFLMAO

Listening to T Boone I see......

--

Scott in Florida

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:23:00 -0700 (PDT), "edspyhill01@yahoo.com"
<edspyhill01@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>Mark wrote:
>> Those numbers are meaningless unless you believe that we use are going
>> to use the world's entire reserve in the next year. Of course trying
>> to reason with a foaming-at-the-mouth Dim is equally meaningless...
>>
>> http://www.runet.edu/~wkovarik/oil/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 28, 4:11?pm, "edspyhil...@yahoo.com" <edspyhil...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> > badgolferman wrote:
>> > > edspyhil...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> >
>> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jekKNdZaeTY&NR=1
>> >
>> > > You wish he was the candidate, don't you?
>> >
>> > We use 25% of world oil but we have just 3% of the reserves.
>
>BUT, there seems to be a strange urgency to give something to oil
>companies before Dubya leaves office. Sort of smells. Sounds like a
>Used Car salesman putting pressure on us.

If you arsehole Dims hadn't stood in the way, we would NOT be paying 4
bucks a gallon for gas.

You also stood in the way of Nuclear power.

We should be making 100 percent of our electricity with nukes.

You people should all be shot....

--

Scott in Florida

Scott in Florida wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:11:06 -0700 (PDT), "edspyhill01@yahoo.com"
> <edspyhill01@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> badgolferman wrote:
>>> edspyhill01@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jekKNdZaeTY&NR=1
>>>
>>> You wish he was the candidate, don't you?
>> We use 25% of world oil but we have just 3% of the reserves.
>
> ROFLMAO
>
> Listening to T Boone I see......

You seem to be quite easily amused. Good for you.
Perhaps you'd care to enlighten me with the actual
percentages if you think that the numbers I quoted
are in error.