http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/...ming020507.htm
--

On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:16:15 -0600, "dbu,." <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote:

>http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/...ming020507.htm

Ahhhhh

The truth comes out....

--

Scott in Florida

In article <3oues2lqbkd5beofr4u6asa8d34n9ms833@4ax.com>,
Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:16:15 -0600, "dbu,." <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote:
>
> >http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/...ming020507.htm
>
> Ahhhhh
>
> The truth comes out....

I'm not sure if this guy is anymore right or wrong than the rest of
them, but it is another opinion and shows that not EVERYONE is on the
bandwagon.
--

dbu,., 2/5/2007, 12:16:15 PM,
<nspam-6790F5.11161505022007@comcast.dca.giganews.com> wrote:

> http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/...ming020507.htm

I love this quote:

"Since I obtained my doctorate in climatology from the University of
London, Queen Mary College, England my career has spanned two climate
cycles. Temperatures declined from 1940 to 1980 and in the early 1970's
global cooling became the consensus. This proves that consensus is not
a scientific fact. By the 1990's temperatures appeared to have reversed
and Global Warming became the consensus. It appears I'll witness
another cycle before retiring, as the major mechanisms and the global
temperature trends now indicate a cooling."

and this one:

"I once received a three page letter that my lawyer defined as
libellous, from an academic colleague, saying I had no right to say
what I was saying, especially in public lectures. Sadly, my experience
is that universities are the most dogmatic and oppressive places in our
society. This becomes progressively worse as they receive more and more
funding from governments that demand a particular viewpoint."
----------------------------

Global Warming as caused by humans has turned into the latest money
maker for those who depend upon government grants for their existence.
They are merely creating a problem to legitimize themselves and create
fame or fortune. It is good that more and more actual scientists are
debunking this myth.

On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:49:34 -0600, "dbu,." <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote:

>In article <3oues2lqbkd5beofr4u6asa8d34n9ms833@4ax.com>,
> Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:16:15 -0600, "dbu,." <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote:
>>
>> >http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/...ming020507.htm
>>
>> Ahhhhh
>>
>> The truth comes out....
>
>I'm not sure if this guy is anymore right or wrong than the rest of
>them, but it is another opinion and shows that not EVERYONE is on the
>bandwagon.

His opinion's make sense....the crowd's opinions are just politics...

--

Scott in Florida

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:45c77dbb$0$97220$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readf reenews.net...

>
> Global Warming as caused by humans has turned into the latest money
> maker for those who depend upon government grants for their existence.


So, we need to listen only to scientists who work for free. Right?

On Feb 5, 2:23 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:45c77dbb$0$97220$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readf reenews.net...
>
>
>
> > Global Warming as caused by humans has turned into the latest money
> > maker for those who depend upon government grants for their existence.
>
> So, we need to listen only to scientists who work for free. Right?

..
> So, we need to listen only to scientists who work for free. Right?

How can we trust them - people who work for free must be commies. A
real rightie would do this work only for big bucks plus bonuses and
other perks.

A

<annecoultersadamsapple@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1170704105.529249.199260@q2g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
> On Feb 5, 2:23 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:45c77dbb$0$97220$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readf reenews.net...
>>
>>
>>
>> > Global Warming as caused by humans has turned into the latest money
>> > maker for those who depend upon government grants for their existence.
>>
>> So, we need to listen only to scientists who work for free. Right?
>
> .
>> So, we need to listen only to scientists who work for free. Right?
>
> How can we trust them - people who work for free must be commies. A
> real rightie would do this work only for big bucks plus bonuses and
> other perks.
>
> A
>


I guess you're right. The only reliable sources for environmental
information are George Bush, and oil companies & utilities. How could I have
missed this?

"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:NuLxh.2010$B25.455@news01.roc.ny...
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:45c77dbb$0$97220$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readf reenews.net...
>
>>
>> Global Warming as caused by humans has turned into the latest money
>> maker for those who depend upon government grants for their existence.
>
>
> So, we need to listen only to scientists who work for free. Right?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It seems as if, in the real world and in our little group, there are two
kinds of folks.
1. Those who read all they can about the probable phenomenon known as
global warming, including seeing AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH
2. Those who stick their fingers in their ears, yelling "I can't hear you!"
and scrupulously avoid any intelligent discussion of global warming.

It's nice to know that even Sen. McCain now says the argument over global
warming is over. Took him a while to come around.

On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 11:39:34 -0800, "mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com>
wrote:

>1. Those who read all they can about the probable phenomenon known as
>global warming, including seeing AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH


ROFLMAO.......

--

Scott in Florida