Knut Arvid Keilen <kkeilen@frisurf.no> Thou laughable troll-my-dames.
Thou reeling-ripe heartless hind. Thou stigmatic. Thou art a frantic
fool, hiding thy better jests in blunt behaviour. Ye illumined and ye
muddled:

> The number 2^1024-1 (about (-)1.79E+308) is perhaps the largest
> relevant number for practical purposes.
>
> Similarly the number 2^-1024+1 (about (-)5.56E-309) is the smallest
> relevant number for practical purposes.
>
> Anyone there using numbers for calculation that goes beyond these
> numbers ?

Yes. I just used 2^1024-1)+1 to calculate that you're a fuckwit.

--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist to Kadaitcha Man:
"Imagine if I were to suggest "I have a prehensile tail". You
would, naturally, ask for evidence."

Kadaitcha Man in reply to fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist:
"Not at all. I would unquestionably accept your admission to being
a monkey."

"I have forgotten more about IT than both you sorry bitches combined."
DUHane Arnold in <r_myh.20067$yx6.64@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.n et>

Snarky: "I think 'Wolfy's taking the piss..."
Kadaitcha Man: "In which orifice?"

Otter <konrad@lorenz.net> Thou mouldy bawd-born. Thou droning
fat-brained followers. Thou carbuncle. Thou spider-legged, impertinent
botcher's apprentice. Ye panted and ye winced:

> In
> news:B5EB129E.D2644213.97A8723E.8F2459E2@piteous-fun-truncheon.org.jp,
> Matsuo Koga <inelegant-cab-moll@big-fertile-delta.com> typed:
>> Knut Arvid Keilen <kkeilen@frisurf.no> Thou laughable troll-my-dames.
>> Thou reeling-ripe heartless hind. Thou stigmatic. Thou art a frantic
>> fool, hiding thy better jests in blunt behaviour. Ye illumined and ye
>> muddled:
>>
>>> The number 2^1024-1 (about (-)1.79E+308) is perhaps the largest
>>> relevant number for practical purposes.
>>>
>>> Similarly the number 2^-1024+1 (about (-)5.56E-309) is the smallest
>>> relevant number for practical purposes.
>>>
>>> Anyone there using numbers for calculation that goes beyond these
>>> numbers ?
>>
>> Yes. I just used 2^1024-1)+1 to calculate that you're a fuckwit.
>
> You have a lot of fingers and toes.

I have ten times as many fingers and toes as you have brain cells.

--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist to Kadaitcha Man:
"Imagine if I were to suggest "I have a prehensile tail". You
would, naturally, ask for evidence."

Kadaitcha Man in reply to fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist:
"Not at all. I would unquestionably accept your admission to being
a monkey."

"I have forgotten more about IT than both you sorry bitches combined."
DUHane Arnold in <r_myh.20067$yx6.64@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.n et>

Snarky: "I think 'Wolfy's taking the piss..."
Kadaitcha Man: "In which orifice?"

In news:438A6A56.A3A94B01.83A3B8DE.47E04174@liberated-jiminy-cricket.org,
Teruo Funakoshi <wicked-b-girl@afflicted-furback-turtle.net.jp> typed:
> Otter <konrad@lorenz.net> Thou mouldy bawd-born. Thou droning
> fat-brained followers. Thou carbuncle. Thou spider-legged, impertinent
> botcher's apprentice. Ye panted and ye winced:
>
>> In
>> news:B5EB129E.D2644213.97A8723E.8F2459E2@piteous-fun-truncheon.org.jp,
>> Matsuo Koga <inelegant-cab-moll@big-fertile-delta.com> typed:
>>> Knut Arvid Keilen <kkeilen@frisurf.no> Thou laughable
>>> troll-my-dames. Thou reeling-ripe heartless hind. Thou stigmatic.
>>> Thou art a frantic fool, hiding thy better jests in blunt
>>> behaviour. Ye illumined and ye muddled:
>>>
>>>> The number 2^1024-1 (about (-)1.79E+308) is perhaps the largest
>>>> relevant number for practical purposes.
>>>>
>>>> Similarly the number 2^-1024+1 (about (-)5.56E-309) is the smallest
>>>> relevant number for practical purposes.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone there using numbers for calculation that goes beyond these
>>>> numbers ?
>>>
>>> Yes. I just used 2^1024-1)+1 to calculate that you're a fuckwit.
>>
>> You have a lot of fingers and toes.
>
> I have ten times as many fingers and toes as you have brain cells.

Take you quite a few thousand years to clip them, eh?

Otter <konrad@lorenz.net> Thou deranged egregious murderer. Thou obscene
most poor credulous monster. Thou ungracious boy. Thou blue-haired,
porn-ogling daily break-vow. Ye clacked and ye tehee'd:

> In
> news:438A6A56.A3A94B01.83A3B8DE.47E04174@liberated-jiminy-cricket.org,
> Teruo Funakoshi <wicked-b-girl@afflicted-furback-turtle.net.jp>
> typed:
>> Otter <konrad@lorenz.net> Thou mouldy bawd-born. Thou droning
>> fat-brained followers. Thou carbuncle. Thou spider-legged,
>> impertinent botcher's apprentice. Ye panted and ye winced:
>>
>>> In
>>> news:B5EB129E.D2644213.97A8723E.8F2459E2@piteous-fun-truncheon.org.jp,
>>> Matsuo Koga <inelegant-cab-moll@big-fertile-delta.com> typed:
>>>> Knut Arvid Keilen <kkeilen@frisurf.no> Thou laughable
>>>> troll-my-dames. Thou reeling-ripe heartless hind. Thou stigmatic.
>>>> Thou art a frantic fool, hiding thy better jests in blunt
>>>> behaviour. Ye illumined and ye muddled:
>>>>
>>>>> The number 2^1024-1 (about (-)1.79E+308) is perhaps the largest
>>>>> relevant number for practical purposes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Similarly the number 2^-1024+1 (about (-)5.56E-309) is the
>>>>> smallest relevant number for practical purposes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone there using numbers for calculation that goes beyond these
>>>>> numbers ?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. I just used 2^1024-1)+1 to calculate that you're a fuckwit.
>>>
>>> You have a lot of fingers and toes.
>>
>> I have ten times as many fingers and toes as you have brain cells.
>
> Take you quite a few thousand years to clip them, eh?

No. Hold out your hands and I'll show you how quick it can be done.

<fires up buzz saw>

--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist to Kadaitcha Man:
"Imagine if I were to suggest "I have a prehensile tail". You
would, naturally, ask for evidence."

Kadaitcha Man in reply to fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist:
"Not at all. I would unquestionably accept your admission to being
a monkey."

"I have forgotten more about IT than both you sorry bitches combined."
DUHane Arnold in <r_myh.20067$yx6.64@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.n et>

Snarky: "I think 'Wolfy's taking the piss..."
Kadaitcha Man: "In which orifice?"

In news:B200A2B9.5991417D.BF566AC8.D9C445E6@large-footlong.org.jp,
Soshitsu Fugunaga <tentacled-camp-follower@hulking-heart-shaped-box.net>
typed:
> Otter <konrad@lorenz.net> Thou deranged egregious murderer. Thou
> obscene most poor credulous monster. Thou ungracious boy. Thou
> blue-haired, porn-ogling daily break-vow. Ye clacked and ye tehee'd:
>
>> In
>> news:438A6A56.A3A94B01.83A3B8DE.47E04174@liberated-jiminy-cricket.org,
>> Teruo Funakoshi <wicked-b-girl@afflicted-furback-turtle.net.jp>
>> typed:
>>> Otter <konrad@lorenz.net> Thou mouldy bawd-born. Thou droning
>>> fat-brained followers. Thou carbuncle. Thou spider-legged,
>>> impertinent botcher's apprentice. Ye panted and ye winced:
>>>
>>>> In
>>>> news:B5EB129E.D2644213.97A8723E.8F2459E2@piteous-fun-truncheon.org.jp,
>>>> Matsuo Koga <inelegant-cab-moll@big-fertile-delta.com> typed:
>>>>> Knut Arvid Keilen <kkeilen@frisurf.no> Thou laughable
>>>>> troll-my-dames. Thou reeling-ripe heartless hind. Thou stigmatic.
>>>>> Thou art a frantic fool, hiding thy better jests in blunt
>>>>> behaviour. Ye illumined and ye muddled:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The number 2^1024-1 (about (-)1.79E+308) is perhaps the largest
>>>>>> relevant number for practical purposes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Similarly the number 2^-1024+1 (about (-)5.56E-309) is the
>>>>>> smallest relevant number for practical purposes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone there using numbers for calculation that goes beyond these
>>>>>> numbers ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. I just used 2^1024-1)+1 to calculate that you're a fuckwit.
>>>>
>>>> You have a lot of fingers and toes.
>>>
>>> I have ten times as many fingers and toes as you have brain cells.
>>
>> Take you quite a few thousand years to clip them, eh?
>
> No. Hold out your hands and I'll show you how quick it can be done.
>
> <fires up buzz saw>

In news:B200A2B9.5991417D.BF566AC8.D9C445E6@large-footlong.org.jp,
Soshitsu Fugunaga <tentacled-camp-follower@hulking-heart-shaped-box.net>
typed:
> Otter <konrad@lorenz.net> Thou deranged egregious murderer. Thou
> obscene most poor credulous monster. Thou ungracious boy. Thou
> blue-haired, porn-ogling daily break-vow. Ye clacked and ye tehee'd:
>
>> In
>> news:438A6A56.A3A94B01.83A3B8DE.47E04174@liberated-jiminy-cricket.org,
>> Teruo Funakoshi <wicked-b-girl@afflicted-furback-turtle.net.jp>
>> typed:
>>> Otter <konrad@lorenz.net> Thou mouldy bawd-born. Thou droning
>>> fat-brained followers. Thou carbuncle. Thou spider-legged,
>>> impertinent botcher's apprentice. Ye panted and ye winced:
>>>
>>>> In
>>>> news:B5EB129E.D2644213.97A8723E.8F2459E2@piteous-fun-truncheon.org.jp,
>>>> Matsuo Koga <inelegant-cab-moll@big-fertile-delta.com> typed:
>>>>> Knut Arvid Keilen <kkeilen@frisurf.no> Thou laughable
>>>>> troll-my-dames. Thou reeling-ripe heartless hind. Thou stigmatic.
>>>>> Thou art a frantic fool, hiding thy better jests in blunt
>>>>> behaviour. Ye illumined and ye muddled:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The number 2^1024-1 (about (-)1.79E+308) is perhaps the largest
>>>>>> relevant number for practical purposes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Similarly the number 2^-1024+1 (about (-)5.56E-309) is the
>>>>>> smallest relevant number for practical purposes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone there using numbers for calculation that goes beyond these
>>>>>> numbers ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. I just used 2^1024-1)+1 to calculate that you're a fuckwit.
>>>>
>>>> You have a lot of fingers and toes.
>>>
>>> I have ten times as many fingers and toes as you have brain cells.
>>
>> Take you quite a few thousand years to clip them, eh?
>
> No. Hold out your hands and I'll show you how quick it can be done.
>
> <fires up buzz saw>

No thanks, but while you have that mechanical device running, you could try
some auto-vivisection.