Transcript from the MSNBC 'press conference' or as the Drive By Media
says is a Dim debate.

This proof positive that Obama is an idiot!

----------------------------------------------------------------------


Williams:

Senator Obama, if, God forbid a thousand times, while we were gathered
here tonight, we learned that two American cities have been hit
simultaneously by terrorists and we further learned, beyond the shadow
of a doubt it had been the work of Al Qaida, how would you change the
U.S. military stance overseas as a result?

Obama: Well, the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've
got an effective emergency response, something that this
administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans.

And I think that we have to review how we operate in the event of not
only a natural disaster, but also a terrorist attack.

The second thing is to make sure that we've got good intelligence, a.,
to find out that we don't have other threats and attacks potentially
out there, and b., to find out, do we have any intelligence on who
might have carried it out so that we can take potentially some action
to dismantle that network.

But what we can't do is then alienate the world community based on
faulty intelligence, based on bluster and bombast. Instead, the next
thing we would have to do, in addition to talking to the American
people, is making sure that we are talking to the international
community.

Because as already been stated, we're not going to defeat terrorists
on our own. We've got to strengthen our intelligence relationships
with them, and they've got to feel a stake in our security by
recognizing that we have mutual security interests at stake.



--

Scott in Florida

On Apr 27, 1:12 pm, Scott in Florida <askifyouw...@mindspring.net>
wrote:
> Transcript from the MSNBC 'press conference' or as the Drive By Media
> says is a Dim debate.
>
> This proof positive that Obama is an idiot!
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Williams:
>
> Senator Obama, if, God forbid a thousand times, while we were gathered
> here tonight, we learned that two American cities have been hit
> simultaneously by terrorists and we further learned, beyond the shadow
> of a doubt it had been the work of Al Qaida, how would you change the
> U.S. military stance overseas as a result?
>
> Obama: Well, the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've
> got an effective emergency response, something that this
> administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans.
>
> And I think that we have to review how we operate in the event of not
> only a natural disaster, but also a terrorist attack.
>
> The second thing is to make sure that we've got good intelligence, a.,
> to find out that we don't have other threats and attacks potentially
> out there, and b., to find out, do we have any intelligence on who
> might have carried it out so that we can take potentially some action
> to dismantle that network.
>
> But what we can't do is then alienate the world community based on
> faulty intelligence, based on bluster and bombast. Instead, the next
> thing we would have to do, in addition to talking to the American
> people, is making sure that we are talking to the international
> community.
>
> Because as already been stated, we're not going to defeat terrorists
> on our own. We've got to strengthen our intelligence relationships
> with them, and they've got to feel a stake in our security by
> recognizing that we have mutual security interests at stake.


Obama is fiddling while Rome is burning. We now know what to expect
if he becomes President. Heck, I expect Hillary Clinton would have
more sense of what to do than this moron.

On 27 Apr 2007 10:29:13 -0700, badgolferman <badgolferman@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Apr 27, 1:12 pm, Scott in Florida <askifyouw...@mindspring.net>
>wrote:
>> Transcript from the MSNBC 'press conference' or as the Drive By Media
>> says is a Dim debate.
>>
>> This proof positive that Obama is an idiot!
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Williams:
>>
>> Senator Obama, if, God forbid a thousand times, while we were gathered
>> here tonight, we learned that two American cities have been hit
>> simultaneously by terrorists and we further learned, beyond the shadow
>> of a doubt it had been the work of Al Qaida, how would you change the
>> U.S. military stance overseas as a result?
>>
>> Obama: Well, the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've
>> got an effective emergency response, something that this
>> administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans.
>>
>> And I think that we have to review how we operate in the event of not
>> only a natural disaster, but also a terrorist attack.
>>
>> The second thing is to make sure that we've got good intelligence, a.,
>> to find out that we don't have other threats and attacks potentially
>> out there, and b., to find out, do we have any intelligence on who
>> might have carried it out so that we can take potentially some action
>> to dismantle that network.
>>
>> But what we can't do is then alienate the world community based on
>> faulty intelligence, based on bluster and bombast. Instead, the next
>> thing we would have to do, in addition to talking to the American
>> people, is making sure that we are talking to the international
>> community.
>>
>> Because as already been stated, we're not going to defeat terrorists
>> on our own. We've got to strengthen our intelligence relationships
>> with them, and they've got to feel a stake in our security by
>> recognizing that we have mutual security interests at stake.
>
>
>Obama is fiddling while Rome is burning. We now know what to expect
>if he becomes President. Heck, I expect Hillary Clinton would have
>more sense of what to do than this moron.

Actually her answer wasn't half bad. A bit of Bush bashing, but it
was not bad.

btw the whole transcript is on the MSNBC web site.




--

Scott in Florida

In article <pjb433hhaf58uhoq204ltttm1j013m2ukr@4ax.com>,
Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:

> Transcript from the MSNBC 'press conference' or as the Drive By Media
> says is a Dim debate.
>
> This proof positive that Obama is an idiot!
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Williams:
>
> Senator Obama, if, God forbid a thousand times, while we were gathered
> here tonight, we learned that two American cities have been hit
> simultaneously by terrorists and we further learned, beyond the shadow
> of a doubt it had been the work of Al Qaida, how would you change the
> U.S. military stance overseas as a result?
>
> Obama: Well, the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've
> got an effective emergency response, something that this
> administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans.
>
> And I think that we have to review how we operate in the event of not
> only a natural disaster, but also a terrorist attack.
>
> The second thing is to make sure that we've got good intelligence, a.,
> to find out that we don't have other threats and attacks potentially
> out there, and b., to find out, do we have any intelligence on who
> might have carried it out so that we can take potentially some action
> to dismantle that network.
>
> But what we can't do is then alienate the world community based on
> faulty intelligence, based on bluster and bombast. Instead, the next
> thing we would have to do, in addition to talking to the American
> people, is making sure that we are talking to the international
> community.
>
> Because as already been stated, we're not going to defeat terrorists
> on our own. We've got to strengthen our intelligence relationships
> with them, and they've got to feel a stake in our security by
> recognizing that we have mutual security interests at stake.

A bunch of wordy political rhetoric BS.

They must think their constituent base is really stupid.
--

From what the kooks post in this NG, and to whom he is speaking, what do you
think about their intelligence level?


mike


"dbu.," <question*mark@einp.com> wrote in message
news:question*mark-E68DB7.13084227042007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <pjb433hhaf58uhoq204ltttm1j013m2ukr@4ax.com>,
> Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>
>> Transcript from the MSNBC 'press conference' or as the Drive By Media
>> says is a Dim debate.
>>
>> This proof positive that Obama is an idiot!
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Williams:
>>
>> Senator Obama, if, God forbid a thousand times, while we were gathered
>> here tonight, we learned that two American cities have been hit
>> simultaneously by terrorists and we further learned, beyond the shadow
>> of a doubt it had been the work of Al Qaida, how would you change the
>> U.S. military stance overseas as a result?
>>
>> Obama: Well, the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've
>> got an effective emergency response, something that this
>> administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans.
>>
>> And I think that we have to review how we operate in the event of not
>> only a natural disaster, but also a terrorist attack.
>>
>> The second thing is to make sure that we've got good intelligence, a.,
>> to find out that we don't have other threats and attacks potentially
>> out there, and b., to find out, do we have any intelligence on who
>> might have carried it out so that we can take potentially some action
>> to dismantle that network.
>>
>> But what we can't do is then alienate the world community based on
>> faulty intelligence, based on bluster and bombast. Instead, the next
>> thing we would have to do, in addition to talking to the American
>> people, is making sure that we are talking to the international
>> community.
>>
>> Because as already been stated, we're not going to defeat terrorists
>> on our own. We've got to strengthen our intelligence relationships
>> with them, and they've got to feel a stake in our security by
>> recognizing that we have mutual security interests at stake.
>
> A bunch of wordy political rhetoric BS.
>
> They must think their constituent base is really stupid.
> --
>

dbu.,, 4/27/2007,2:08:42 PM, wrote:

> A bunch of wordy political rhetoric BS.
>
> They must think their constituent base is really stupid.

Well, it is!

--
“Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything.” ~
Frank Dane

"dbu.," <question*mark@einp.com> wrote in message
news:question*mark-E68DB7.13084227042007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <pjb433hhaf58uhoq204ltttm1j013m2ukr@4ax.com>,
> Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>
>> Transcript from the MSNBC 'press conference' or as the Drive By Media
>> says is a Dim debate.
>>
>> This proof positive that Obama is an idiot!
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Williams:
>>
>> Senator Obama, if, God forbid a thousand times, while we were gathered
>> here tonight, we learned that two American cities have been hit
>> simultaneously by terrorists and we further learned, beyond the shadow
>> of a doubt it had been the work of Al Qaida, how would you change the
>> U.S. military stance overseas as a result?
>>
>> Obama: Well, the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've
>> got an effective emergency response, something that this
>> administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans.
>>
>> And I think that we have to review how we operate in the event of not
>> only a natural disaster, but also a terrorist attack.
>>
>> The second thing is to make sure that we've got good intelligence, a.,
>> to find out that we don't have other threats and attacks potentially
>> out there, and b., to find out, do we have any intelligence on who
>> might have carried it out so that we can take potentially some action
>> to dismantle that network.
>>
>> But what we can't do is then alienate the world community based on
>> faulty intelligence, based on bluster and bombast. Instead, the next
>> thing we would have to do, in addition to talking to the American
>> people, is making sure that we are talking to the international
>> community.
>>
>> Because as already been stated, we're not going to defeat terrorists
>> on our own. We've got to strengthen our intelligence relationships
>> with them, and they've got to feel a stake in our security by
>> recognizing that we have mutual security interests at stake.
>
> A bunch of wordy political rhetoric BS.
>
> They must think their constituent base is really stupid.

funny, I thought Obama was pretty good at answering a cold question like
that off the top of his head.

It sure beats wetting your pants and going ahead with the reading of "My Pet
Goat" to elementary school kids for seven very long minutes and then
spending the rest of the day flying around the midwest until you think of
what you can do.............
> --
>

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:12:17 -0700, "mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com>
wrote:

>
>"dbu.," <question*mark@einp.com> wrote in message
>news:question*mark-E68DB7.13084227042007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> In article <pjb433hhaf58uhoq204ltttm1j013m2ukr@4ax.com>,
>> Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Transcript from the MSNBC 'press conference' or as the Drive By Media
>>> says is a Dim debate.
>>>
>>> This proof positive that Obama is an idiot!
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> Williams:
>>>
>>> Senator Obama, if, God forbid a thousand times, while we were gathered
>>> here tonight, we learned that two American cities have been hit
>>> simultaneously by terrorists and we further learned, beyond the shadow
>>> of a doubt it had been the work of Al Qaida, how would you change the
>>> U.S. military stance overseas as a result?
>>>
>>> Obama: Well, the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've
>>> got an effective emergency response, something that this
>>> administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans.
>>>
>>> And I think that we have to review how we operate in the event of not
>>> only a natural disaster, but also a terrorist attack.
>>>
>>> The second thing is to make sure that we've got good intelligence, a.,
>>> to find out that we don't have other threats and attacks potentially
>>> out there, and b., to find out, do we have any intelligence on who
>>> might have carried it out so that we can take potentially some action
>>> to dismantle that network.
>>>
>>> But what we can't do is then alienate the world community based on
>>> faulty intelligence, based on bluster and bombast. Instead, the next
>>> thing we would have to do, in addition to talking to the American
>>> people, is making sure that we are talking to the international
>>> community.
>>>
>>> Because as already been stated, we're not going to defeat terrorists
>>> on our own. We've got to strengthen our intelligence relationships
>>> with them, and they've got to feel a stake in our security by
>>> recognizing that we have mutual security interests at stake.
>>
>> A bunch of wordy political rhetoric BS.
>>
>> They must think their constituent base is really stupid.
>
>funny, I thought Obama was pretty good at answering a cold question like
>that off the top of his head.

Pretty good?

Surly you jest....

You have a collection of clowns running for President and they showed
it in the 'debate'....

>
>It sure beats wetting your pants and going ahead with the reading of "My Pet
>Goat" to elementary school kids for seven very long minutes and then
>spending the rest of the day flying around the midwest until you think of
>what you can do.............
>> --
>>

What George W. Bush did after he was informed we had been attacked by
terrorists is the only prudent action.

Turns out he wanted to return before his advisors wanted him to. He
took the advice of people that are charged with the safety of the
greatest president of out time....




--

Scott in Florida

I agree with Harry Truman

http://www.rjgeib.com/heroes/truman/...atom-bomb.html

"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:re49339jnl9u6h3cp9vh007oovktpm0kbv@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:12:17 -0700, "mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"dbu.," <question*mark@einp.com> wrote in message
>>news:question*mark-E68DB7.13084227042007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>> In article <pjb433hhaf58uhoq204ltttm1j013m2ukr@4ax.com>,
>>> Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Transcript from the MSNBC 'press conference' or as the Drive By Media
>>>> says is a Dim debate.
>>>>
>>>> This proof positive that Obama is an idiot!
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Williams:
>>>>
>>>> Senator Obama, if, God forbid a thousand times, while we were gathered
>>>> here tonight, we learned that two American cities have been hit
>>>> simultaneously by terrorists and we further learned, beyond the shadow
>>>> of a doubt it had been the work of Al Qaida, how would you change the
>>>> U.S. military stance overseas as a result?
>>>>
>>>> Obama: Well, the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've
>>>> got an effective emergency response, something that this
>>>> administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans.
>>>>
>>>> And I think that we have to review how we operate in the event of not
>>>> only a natural disaster, but also a terrorist attack.
>>>>
>>>> The second thing is to make sure that we've got good intelligence, a.,
>>>> to find out that we don't have other threats and attacks potentially
>>>> out there, and b., to find out, do we have any intelligence on who
>>>> might have carried it out so that we can take potentially some action
>>>> to dismantle that network.
>>>>
>>>> But what we can't do is then alienate the world community based on
>>>> faulty intelligence, based on bluster and bombast. Instead, the next
>>>> thing we would have to do, in addition to talking to the American
>>>> people, is making sure that we are talking to the international
>>>> community.
>>>>
>>>> Because as already been stated, we're not going to defeat terrorists
>>>> on our own. We've got to strengthen our intelligence relationships
>>>> with them, and they've got to feel a stake in our security by
>>>> recognizing that we have mutual security interests at stake.
>>>
>>> A bunch of wordy political rhetoric BS.
>>>
>>> They must think their constituent base is really stupid.
>>
>>funny, I thought Obama was pretty good at answering a cold question like
>>that off the top of his head.
>
> Pretty good?
>
> Surly you jest....
>
> You have a collection of clowns running for President and they showed
> it in the 'debate'....
>
>>
>>It sure beats wetting your pants and going ahead with the reading of "My
>>Pet
>>Goat" to elementary school kids for seven very long minutes and then
>>spending the rest of the day flying around the midwest until you think of
>>what you can do.............
>>> --
>>>
>
> What George W. Bush did after he was informed we had been attacked by
> terrorists is the only prudent action.


No, putting down the book, shaking off the dear-in-the-headlights look, and
getting off his ass IMMEDIATELY would have been prudent.


>
> Turns out he wanted to return before his advisors wanted him to. He
> took the advice of people that are charged with the safety of the
> greatest president of out time....
>
>

They were there?? OK, but I wonder what his own people advised him to do.

>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>
> I agree with Harry Truman
>
> http://www.rjgeib.com/heroes/truman/...atom-bomb.html
>

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:35:49 GMT, "Truckdude" <shrub@thedeecider.com>
wrote:

>
>"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
>news:re49339jnl9u6h3cp9vh007oovktpm0kbv@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:12:17 -0700, "mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"dbu.," <question*mark@einp.com> wrote in message
>>>news:question*mark-E68DB7.13084227042007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>>> In article <pjb433hhaf58uhoq204ltttm1j013m2ukr@4ax.com>,
>>>> Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Transcript from the MSNBC 'press conference' or as the Drive By Media
>>>>> says is a Dim debate.
>>>>>
>>>>> This proof positive that Obama is an idiot!
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Williams:
>>>>>
>>>>> Senator Obama, if, God forbid a thousand times, while we were gathered
>>>>> here tonight, we learned that two American cities have been hit
>>>>> simultaneously by terrorists and we further learned, beyond the shadow
>>>>> of a doubt it had been the work of Al Qaida, how would you change the
>>>>> U.S. military stance overseas as a result?
>>>>>
>>>>> Obama: Well, the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've
>>>>> got an effective emergency response, something that this
>>>>> administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I think that we have to review how we operate in the event of not
>>>>> only a natural disaster, but also a terrorist attack.
>>>>>
>>>>> The second thing is to make sure that we've got good intelligence, a.,
>>>>> to find out that we don't have other threats and attacks potentially
>>>>> out there, and b., to find out, do we have any intelligence on who
>>>>> might have carried it out so that we can take potentially some action
>>>>> to dismantle that network.
>>>>>
>>>>> But what we can't do is then alienate the world community based on
>>>>> faulty intelligence, based on bluster and bombast. Instead, the next
>>>>> thing we would have to do, in addition to talking to the American
>>>>> people, is making sure that we are talking to the international
>>>>> community.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because as already been stated, we're not going to defeat terrorists
>>>>> on our own. We've got to strengthen our intelligence relationships
>>>>> with them, and they've got to feel a stake in our security by
>>>>> recognizing that we have mutual security interests at stake.
>>>>
>>>> A bunch of wordy political rhetoric BS.
>>>>
>>>> They must think their constituent base is really stupid.
>>>
>>>funny, I thought Obama was pretty good at answering a cold question like
>>>that off the top of his head.
>>
>> Pretty good?
>>
>> Surly you jest....
>>
>> You have a collection of clowns running for President and they showed
>> it in the 'debate'....
>>
>>>
>>>It sure beats wetting your pants and going ahead with the reading of "My
>>>Pet
>>>Goat" to elementary school kids for seven very long minutes and then
>>>spending the rest of the day flying around the midwest until you think of
>>>what you can do.............
>>>> --
>>>>
>>
>> What George W. Bush did after he was informed we had been attacked by
>> terrorists is the only prudent action.
>
>
>No, putting down the book, shaking off the dear-in-the-headlights look, and
>getting off his ass IMMEDIATELY would have been prudent.

There was NO reason to alarm the children in that classroom. He did
the right thing...

What would you have done?


>
>
>>
>> Turns out he wanted to return before his advisors wanted him to. He
>> took the advice of people that are charged with the safety of the
>> greatest president of out time....
>>
>>
>
>They were there?? OK, but I wonder what his own people advised him to do.

Yes the secret service is always there...


>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott in Florida
>>
>> I agree with Harry Truman
>>
>> http://www.rjgeib.com/heroes/truman/...atom-bomb.html
>>
>



--

Scott in Florida

I agree with John McCain

'Bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran'


I also agree with Harry Truman

http://www.rjgeib.com/heroes/truman/...atom-bomb.html